<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Systematic Biology - recent issues</title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Systematic Biology - RSS feed of recent issues (covers the latest 3 issues, including the current issue) </description>
<prism:eIssn>1076-836X</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Systematic Biology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1063-5157</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/A2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/560?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/573?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/586?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/595?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/629?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/659?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/463?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/468?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/478?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/489?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/501?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/509?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/527?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/537?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/544?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-c?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/381?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/395?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/411?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/425?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/461?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp085</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp086</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp087</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/A2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Announcements]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/A2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp084</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Announcements]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>A2</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>A2</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcements</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Species Tree Discordance Traces to Phylogeographic Clade Boundaries in North American Fence Lizards (Sceloporus)]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>I investigated the impacts of phylogeographic sampling decisions on species tree estimation in the <I>Sceloporus undulatus</I> species group, a recent radiation of small, insectivorous lizards connected by parapatric and peripatric distribution across North America, using a variety of species tree inference methods (Bayesian estimation of species trees, Bayesian untangling of concordance knots, and minimize deep coalescences). Phylogenetic analyses of 16 specimens representing 4 putative species within <I>S.</I> "<I>undulatus</I>" using complete (8 loci, &gt;5.5 kb) and incomplete (29 loci, &gt;23.6 kb) nuclear data sets result in species trees that share features with the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) genealogy at the phylogeographic level but provide new insights into the evolutionary history of the species group. The concatenated nuclear data and mtDNA data both recover 4 major clades connecting populations across North America; however, instances of discordance are localized at the contact zones between adjacent phylogeographic groups. A random sub-sampling experiment designed to vary the phylogeographic samples included across hundreds of replicate species tree inferences suggests that inaccurate species assignments can result in inferred phylogenetic relationships that are dependent upon which particular populations are used as exemplars to represent species and can lead to increased estimates of effective population size (). For the phylogeographic data presented here, reassigning specimens with introgressed mtDNA genomes to their prospective species, or excluding them from the analysis altogether, produces species tree topologies that are distinctly different from analyses that utilize mtDNA-based species assignments. Evolutionary biologists working at the interface of phylogeography and phylogenetics are likely to encounter multiple processes influencing gene trees congruence, which increases the relevance of estimating species trees with multilocus nuclear data and models that accommodate deep coalescence.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leache, A. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Species Tree Discordance Traces to Phylogeographic Clade Boundaries in North American Fence Lizards (Sceloporus)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>559</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/560?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Use and Validity of Composite Taxa in Phylogenetic Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/560?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In phylogenetic analysis, one possible approach to minimize missing data in DNA supermatrices consists in sampling sequences from different species to obtain a complete sequence for all genes included in the study. We refer to those complete sequences as composite taxa because DNA sequences that are combined belong to different species. An alternative approach is to analyze incomplete supermatrices by coding unavailable DNA sequences as missing. The accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated using matrices that include composite taxa has recently been questioned, and the best approach for analyzing incomplete supermatrices is highly debated. Through computer simulations, we compared the phylogenetic accuracy of the 2 competing approaches. We explored the effect of composite taxa when inferring higher level relationships, that is, relationships between monophyletic groups. DNA sequences were simulated on a 42-taxon model tree and incomplete supermatrices containing different percentages of missing data were generated. These incomplete supermatrices were analyzed either by coding the missing data with "?" or by reducing the amount of missing data through the combination of 2 or more taxa to generate composite taxa. Of 180 comparisons (18 simulation cases with 2 different inference methods and 5 levels of incompleteness), we observed significantly higher phylogenetic accuracies for composite matrices in 46 comparisons, whereas missing data matrices outperformed composites in 8 comparisons. In all other cases, the phylogenetic accuracy obtained with composite matrices was not significantly different from that of missing data matrices. This study demonstrates that composite taxa represent an interesting approach to minimize the amount of missing data in supermatrices and we suggest that it is the optimal approach to use in phylogenomic studies to reduce computing time.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, V., Lapointe, F.-J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Use and Validity of Composite Taxa in Phylogenetic Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>572</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>560</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/573?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Radiation of Extant Cetaceans Driven by Restructuring of the Oceans]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/573?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The remarkable fossil record of whales and dolphins (Cetacea) has made them an exemplar of macroevolution. Although their overall adaptive transition from terrestrial to fully aquatic organisms is well known, this is not true for the radiation of modern whales. Here, we explore the diversification of extant cetaceans by constructing a robust molecular phylogeny that includes 87 of 89 extant species. The phylogeny and divergence times are derived from nuclear and mitochondrial markers, calibrated with fossils. We find that the toothed whales are monophyletic, suggesting that echolocation evolved only once early in that lineage some 36&ndash;34 Ma. The rorqual family (Balaenopteridae) is restored with the exclusion of the gray whale, suggesting that gulp feeding evolved 18&ndash;16 Ma. Delphinida, comprising all living dolphins and porpoises other than the Ganges/Indus dolphins, originated about 26 Ma; it contains the taxonomically rich delphinids, which began diversifying less than 11 Ma. We tested 2 hypothesized drivers of the extant cetacean radiation by assessing the tempo of lineage accumulation through time. We find no support for a rapid burst of speciation early in the history of extant whales, contrasting with expectations of an adaptive radiation model. However, we do find support for increased diversification rates during periods of pronounced physical restructuring of the oceans. The results imply that paleogeographic and paleoceanographic changes, such as closure of major seaways, have influenced the dynamics of radiation in extant cetaceans.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeman, M. E., Hebsgaard, M. B., Fordyce, R. E., Ho, S. Y. W., Rabosky, D. L., Nielsen, R., Rahbek, C., Glenner, H., Sorensen, M. V., Willerslev, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp060</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Radiation of Extant Cetaceans Driven by Restructuring of the Oceans]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>585</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>573</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/586?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Taxon Selection under Split Diversity]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/586?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The "phylogenetic diversity" (PD) measure of biodiversity is evaluated using a phylogenetic tree, usually inferred from morphological or molecular data. Consequently, it is vulnerable to errors in that tree, including those resulting from sampling error, model misspecification, or conflicting signals. To improve the robustness of PD, we can evaluate the measure using either a collection (or distribution) of trees or a phylogenetic network. Recently, it has been shown that these 2 approaches are equivalent but that the problem of maximizing PD in the general concept is NP-hard. In this study, we provide an efficient dynamic programming algorithm for maximizing PD when splits in the trees or network form a circular split system. We illustrate our method using a case study of game birds ("Galliformes") and discuss the different choices of taxa based on our approach and PD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Minh, B. Q., Klaere, S., von Haeseler, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp058</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Taxon Selection under Split Diversity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>586</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/595?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating Trait-Dependent Speciation and Extinction Rates from Incompletely Resolved Phylogenies]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/595?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Species traits may influence rates of speciation and extinction, affecting both the patterns of diversification among lineages and the distribution of traits among species. Existing likelihood approaches for detecting differential diversification require complete phylogenies; that is, every extant species must be present in a well-resolved phylogeny. We developed 2 likelihood methods that can be used to infer the effect of a trait on speciation and extinction without complete phylogenetic information, generalizing the recent binary-state speciation and extinction method. Our approaches can be used where a phylogeny can be reasonably assumed to be a random sample of extant species or where all extant species are included but some are assigned only to terminal unresolved clades. We explored the effects of decreasing phylogenetic resolution on the ability of our approach to detect differential diversification within a Bayesian framework using simulated phylogenies. Differential diversification caused by an asymmetry in speciation rates was nearly as well detected with only 50% of extant species phylogenetically resolved as with complete phylogenetic knowledge. We demonstrate our unresolved clade method with an analysis of sexual dimorphism and diversification in shorebirds (Charadriiformes). Our methods allow for the direct estimation of the effect of a trait on speciation and extinction rates using incompletely resolved phylogenies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[FitzJohn, R. G., Maddison, W. P., Otto, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp067</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating Trait-Dependent Speciation and Extinction Rates from Incompletely Resolved Phylogenies]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>611</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>595</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reticulation, Data Combination, and Inferring Evolutionary History: An Example from Danthonioideae (Poaceae)]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We explore the potential impact of conflicting gene trees on inferences of evolutionary history above the species level. When conflict between gene trees is discovered, it is common practice either to analyze the data separately or to combine the data having excluded the conflicting taxa or data partitions for those taxa (which are then recoded as missing). We demonstrate an alternative approach, which involves duplicating conflicting taxa in the matrix, such that each duplicate is represented by one partition only. This allows the combination of all available data in standard phylogenetic analyses, despite reticulations. We show how interpretation of contradictory gene trees can lead to conflicting inferences of both morphological evolution and biogeographic history, using the example of the pampas grasses, <I>Cortaderia</I>. The characteristic morphological syndrome of <I>Cortaderia</I> can be inferred as having arisen multiple times (chloroplast DNA [cpDNA]) or just once (nuclear ribosomal DNA [nrDNA]). The distributions of species of <I>Cortaderia</I> and related genera in Australia/New Guinea, New Zealand, and South America can be explained by few (nrDNA) or several (cpDNA) dispersals between the southern continents. These contradictions can be explained by past hybridization events, which have linked gains of complex morphologies with unrelated chloroplast lineages and have erased evidence of dispersals from the nuclear genome. Given the discrepancies between inferences based on the gene trees individually, we urge the use of approaches such as ours that take multiple gene trees into account.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pirie, M. D., Humphreys, A. M., Barker, N. P., Linder, H. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp068</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reticulation, Data Combination, and Inferring Evolutionary History: An Example from Danthonioideae (Poaceae)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>628</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/629?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Heritability of Extinction Rates Links Diversification Patterns in Molecular Phylogenies and Fossils]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/629?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Time-calibrated molecular phylogenies provide a valuable window into the tempo and mode of species diversification, especially for the large number of groups that lack adequate fossil records. Molecular phylogenetic data frequently suggest an initial "explosive speciation" phase, leading to widespread speculation that ecological niche-filling processes might govern the dynamics of species diversification during evolutionary radiations. However, these patterns are difficult to reconcile with the fossil record. The fossil record strongly suggests that extinction rates have been high relative to speciation rates, but such elevated background extinction should erase the signal of early, rapid speciation from molecular phylogenies. For this reason, extinction rates in molecular phylogenies are frequently estimated as zero under the widely used birth&ndash;death model. Here, I construct a simple model that combines phylogenetically patterned extinction with pulsed turnover dynamics and constant diversity through time. Using approximate Bayesian methods, I show that heritable extinction can easily explain the phenomenon of explosive early diversification, even when net diversification rates are equal to zero. Several assumptions of the model are more consistent with both the fossil record and neontological data than the standard birth&ndash;death model and it may thus represent a viable alternative interpretation of phylogenetic diversification patterns. These results suggest that variation in the absolute rate of lineage turnover through time, in conjunction with phylogenetically nonrandom extinction, may underlie the apparent diversity-dependent speciation observed in molecular phylogenies.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabosky, D. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Heritability of Extinction Rates Links Diversification Patterns in Molecular Phylogenies and Fossils]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>640</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>629</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Testing Species-Level Diversification Hypotheses in Madagascar: The Case of Microendemic Brookesia Leaf Chameleons]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Madagascar's flora and fauna are remarkable both for their diversity and supraspecific endemism. Moreover, many taxa contain large numbers of species with limited distributions. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this high level of microendemism, including 1) riverine barrier, 2) mountain refuge, and 3) watershed contraction hypotheses, the latter 2 of which center on fragmentation due to climatic shifts associated with Pliocene/Pleistocene glaciations. The Malagasy leaf chameleon genus <I>Brookesia</I> is a speciose group with a high proportion of microendemic taxa, thus making it an excellent candidate to test these vicariance scenarios. We used mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data to construct a <I>Brookesia</I> phylogeny, and temporal concordance with Pliocene/Pleistocene speciation scenarios was tested by estimating divergence dates using a relaxed-clock Bayesian method. We strongly reject a role for Pliocene/Pleistocene climatic fluctuations in species-level diversification of <I>Brookesia</I>. We also used simulations to test the spatial predictions of the watershed contraction model in a phylogenetic context, independent of its temporal component, and found no statistical support for this model. The riverine barrier model is likewise a qualitatively poor fit to our data, but some relationships support a more ancient mountain refuge effect. We assessed support for the 3 hypotheses in a nonphylogenetic context by examining altitude and species richness and found a significant positive correlation between these variables. This is consistent with a mountain refuge effect but does not support the watershed contraction or riverine barrier models. Finally, we find repeated higher level east-west divergence patterns 1) between the 2 sister clades comprising the <I>Brookesia minima</I> group and 2) within the clade of larger leaf chameleons, which shows a basal divergence between western and eastern/northern sister clades. Our results highlight the central role of phylogeny in any meaningful tests of species-level diversification theories.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Townsend, T. M., Vieites, D. R., Glaw, F., Vences, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp073</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Testing Species-Level Diversification Hypotheses in Madagascar: The Case of Microendemic Brookesia Leaf Chameleons]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>656</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stephen Jay Gould: Reflections on His View of Life]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morrison, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp070</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stephen Jay Gould: Reflections on His View of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>658</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/659?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/6/659?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chesser, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:30:11 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Systematics and Taxonomy of Australian Birds]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>661</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-12-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>659</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp092</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp093</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp094</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp095</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Standing Material</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/463?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating Species Trees: Methods of Phylogenetic Analysis When There Is Incongruence across Genes]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/463?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowles, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp061</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating Species Trees: Methods of Phylogenetic Analysis When There Is Incongruence across Genes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>467</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>463</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES SPECIES TREES AND GENE-TREE HETEROGENEITY: CONCEPTS, ESTIMATION AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating Species Phylogenies Using Coalescence Times among Sequences]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The estimation of species trees (phylogenies) is one of the most important problems in evolutionary biology, and recently, there has been greater appreciation of the need to estimate species trees directly rather than using gene trees as a surrogate. A Bayesian method constructed under the multispecies coalescent model can consistently estimate species trees but involves intensive computation, which can hinder its application to the phylogenetic analysis of large-scale genomic data. Many summary statistics&ndash;based approaches, such as shallowest coalescences (SC) and Global LAteSt Split (GLASS), have been developed to infer species phylogenies for multilocus data sets. In this paper, we propose 2 methods, species tree estimation using average ranks of coalescences (STAR) and species tree estimation using average coalescence times (STEAC), based on the summary statistics of coalescence times. It can be shown that the 2 methods are statistically consistent under the multispecies coalescent model. STAR uses the ranks of coalescences and is thus resistant to variable substitution rates along the branches in gene trees. A simulation study suggests that STAR consistently outperforms STEAC, SC, and GLASS when the substitution rates among lineages are highly variable. Two real genomic data sets were analyzed by the 2 methods and produced species trees that are consistent with previous results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, L., Yu, L., Pearl, D. K., Edwards, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating Species Phylogenies Using Coalescence Times among Sequences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>477</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES SPECIES TREES AND GENE-TREE HETEROGENEITY: CONCEPTS, ESTIMATION AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/478?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/478?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>As DNA sequences have become more readily available, it has become increasingly desirable to infer species phylogenies from multigene data sets. Much recent work has centered around the recognition that substantial incongruence in single-gene phylogenies necessitates the development of statistical procedures to estimate species phylogenies that appropriately model the process of evolution at the level of the individual genes. One process that gives rise to variation in the histories of individual genes is incomplete lineage sorting, which is commonly modeled by the coalescent, and thus much current work is focused on proper estimation of species phylogenies under the coalescent model. A second common source of discord in single-gene phylogenies is hybridization, a process that is ubiquitous in many groups of plants and animals. Although methods to incorporate hybridization into phylogenetic estimation have also been developed, only a handful of methods that address both coalescence and hybridization have been proposed. Here, I propose an extension of an existing model that incorporates both of these processes simultaneously by utilizing gene trees for inference in a likelihood framework. The model allows examination of the evidence for hybridization in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting due to deep coalescence via model selection using standard information criteria (e.g., Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion). The potential of the method is evaluated using simulated data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kubatko, L. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp055</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>488</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>478</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES SPECIES TREES AND GENE-TREE HETEROGENEITY: CONCEPTS, ESTIMATION AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/489?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Species Trees from Highly Incongruent Gene Trees in Rice]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/489?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Several methods have recently been developed to infer multilocus phylogenies by incorporating information from topological incongruence of the individual genes. In this study, we investigate 2 such methods, Bayesian concordance analysis and Bayesian estimation of species trees. Our test data are a collection of genes from cultivated rice (genus <I>Oryza</I>) and the most closely related wild species, generated using a high-throughput sequencing protocol and bioinformatics pipeline. Trees inferred from independent genes display levels of topological incongruence that far exceed that seen in previous data sets analyzed with these species tree methods. We identify differences in phylogenetic results between inference methods that incorporate gene tree incongruence. Finally, we discuss the challenges of scaling these analyses for data sets with thousands of gene trees and extensive levels of missing data.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cranston, K. A., Hurwitz, B., Ware, D., Stein, L., Wing, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp054</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Species Trees from Highly Incongruent Gene Trees in Rice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>500</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>489</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES SPECIES TREES AND GENE-TREE HETEROGENEITY: CONCEPTS, ESTIMATION AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/501?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Species Trees: How Accuracy of Phylogenetic Inference Depends upon the Divergence History and Sampling Design]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/501?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The understanding that gene trees are often in discord with each other and with the species trees that contain them has led researchers to methods that incorporate the inherent stochasticity of genetic processes in the phylogenetic estimation procedure. Recently developed methods for species-tree estimation that not only consider the retention and sorting of ancestral polymorphism but also quantify the actual probabilities of incomplete lineage sorting are expected to provide an improvement over earlier summary-statistic based approaches that discard much of the information content of gene trees. However, these new methods have yet to be tested on truly challenging evolutionary histories such as those marked by recent rapid speciation where high levels of incomplete lineage sorting and discord among gene trees predominate. Here, we test a new maximum-likelihood method that incorporates stochastic models of both nucleotide substitution and lineage sorting for species-tree estimation. Using a simulation approach, we consider a broad range of species-tree topologies under 2 scenarios representing moderate and severe incomplete lineage sorting. We show that the maximum-likelihood method results in more accurate species trees than a summary-statistic based approach, demonstrating that information contained in discordant gene trees can be effectively extracted using a full probabilistic model. Moreover, we demonstrate that the shape of the original species tree (i.e., the relative lengths of internal branches) has a significant impact on whether the species tree is estimated accurately. In the speciation histories explored here, it is not just the recent origin of species that affects the accuracy of the estimates but the variance in relative species divergence times as well. Additionally, we show that sampling effort (number of individuals and/or loci) and sampling design (ratio of individuals to loci) are both important factors affecting the accuracy of species-tree estimates, which is again affected by the relative timing of divergence among species. The inherent difficulties of estimating relationships when species have undergone a recent radiation are discussed, and in particular, the limitations with maximum-likelihood estimates of species trees that do not consider uncertainty in the estimated gene trees of individual loci. Thus, despite substantial improvements over current summary-statistic based approaches, and the increased sophistication of procedures that incorporate the process of gene lineage coalescence, recent radiations still appear to pose daunting challenges for phylogenetics</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCormack, J. E., Huang, H., Knowles, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp045</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Species Trees: How Accuracy of Phylogenetic Inference Depends upon the Divergence History and Sampling Design]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>508</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>501</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SOCIETY OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGISTS SYMPOSIUM ARTICLES SPECIES TREES AND GENE-TREE HETEROGENEITY: CONCEPTS, ESTIMATION AND EMPIRICAL APPLICATIONS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/509?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Molecular Phylogenetics of Thecata (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) Reveals Long-Term Maintenance of Life History Traits despite High Frequency of Recent Character Changes]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/509?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two fundamental life cycle types are recognized among hydrozoan cnidarians, the benthic (generally colonial) polyp stage either producing pelagic sexual medusae or directly releasing gametes elaborated from an attached gonophore. The existence of intermediate forms, with polyps producing simple medusoids, has been classically considered compelling evidence in favor of phyletic gradualism. In order to gain insights about the evolution of hydrozoan life history traits, we inferred phylogenetic relationships of 142 species of Thecata (= Leptothecata, Leptomedusae), the most species-rich hydrozoan group, using 3 different ribosomal RNA markers (16S, 18S, and 28S). In conflict with morphology-derived classifications, most thecate species fell in 2 well-supported clades named here Statocysta and Macrocolonia. We inferred many independent medusa losses among Statocysta. Several instances of secondary regain of medusoids (but not of full medusa) from medusa-less ancestors were supported among Macrocolonia. Furthermore, life cycle character changes were significantly correlated with changes affecting colony shape. For both traits, changes did not reflect graded and progressive loss or gain of complexity. They were concentrated in recent branches, with intermediate character states being relatively short lived at a large evolutionary scale. This punctuational pattern supports the existence of 2 alternative stable evolutionary strategies: simple stolonal colonies with medusae (the ancestral strategy, seen in most Statocysta species) versus large complex colonies with fixed gonophores (the derived strategy, seen in most Macrocolonia species). Hypotheses of species selection are proposed to explain the apparent long-term stability of these life history traits despite a high frequency of character change. Notably, maintenance of the medusa across geological time in Statocysta might be due to higher extinction rates for species that have lost this dispersive stage.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leclere, L., Schuchert, P., Cruaud, C., Couloux, A., Manuel, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp044</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Molecular Phylogenetics of Thecata (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria) Reveals Long-Term Maintenance of Life History Traits despite High Frequency of Recent Character Changes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>526</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>509</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REGULAR ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/527?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Is the Danger of the Anomaly Zone for Empirical Phylogenetics?]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/527?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The increasing number of observations of gene trees with discordant topologies in phylogenetic studies has raised awareness about the problems of incongruence between species trees and gene trees. Moreover, theoretical treatments focusing on the impact of coalescent variance on phylogenetic study have also identified situations where the most probable gene trees are ones that do not match the underlying species tree (i.e., anomalous gene trees [AGTs]). However, although the theoretical proof of the existence of AGTs is alarming, the actual risk that AGTs pose to empirical phylogenetic study is far from clear. Establishing the conditions (i.e., the branch lengths in a species tree) for which AGTs are possible does not address the critical issue of how prevalent they might be. Furthermore, theoretical characterization of the species trees for which AGTs may pose a problem (i.e., the anomaly zone or the species histories for which AGTs are theoretically possible) is based on consideration of just one source of variance that contributes to species tree and gene tree discord&mdash;gene lineage coalescence. Yet, empirical data contain another important stochastic component&mdash;mutational variance. Estimated gene trees will differ from the underlying gene trees (i.e., the actual genealogy) because of the random process of mutation. Here, we take a simulation approach to investigate the prevalence of AGTs, among estimated gene trees, thereby characterizing the boundaries of the anomaly zone taking into account both coalescent and mutational variances. We also determine the frequency of realized AGTs, which is critical to putting the theoretical work on AGTs into a realistic biological context. Two salient results emerge from this investigation. First, our results show that mutational variance can indeed expand the parameter space (i.e., the relative branch lengths in a species tree) where AGTs might be observed in empirical data. By exploring the underlying cause for the expanded anomaly zone, we identify aspects of empirical data relevant to avoiding the problems that AGTs pose for species tree inference from multilocus data. Second, for the empirical species histories where AGTs are possible, unresolved trees&mdash;not AGTs&mdash;predominate the pool of estimated gene trees. This result suggests that the risk of AGTs, while they exist in theory, may rarely be realized in practice. By considering the biological realities of both mutational and coalescent variances, the study has refined, and redefined, what the actual challenges are for empirical phylogenetic study of recently diverged taxa that have speciated rapidly&mdash;AGTs themselves are unlikely to pose a significant danger to empirical phylogenetic study.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huang, H., Knowles, L. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp047</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Is the Danger of the Anomaly Zone for Empirical Phylogenetics?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>536</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>527</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>REGULAR ARTICLES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/537?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Correction Corrected: Consensus Over the Meaning of Crocodylia and Why It Matters]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/537?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brochu, C. A., Wagner, J. R., Jouve, S., Sumrall, C. D., Densmore, L. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp053</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Correction Corrected: Consensus Over the Meaning of Crocodylia and Why It Matters]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>543</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>537</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>POINT OF VIEW</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/544?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/5/544?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkins, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:59:28 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp048</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evidence and Evolution: The Logic behind the Science]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>545</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>544</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cover]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp063</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cover]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp064</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Editorial Board]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorial Board</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp065</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Subscriptions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Subscription</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-c?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/NP-c?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp066</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Table of Contents]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>NP</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>NP</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Table of Contents</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/381?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/381?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Many published phylogenies are based on methods that assume equal nucleotide composition among taxa. Studies have shown, however, that this assumption is often not accurate, particularly in divergent lineages. Nonstationary sequence evolution, when taxa in different lineages evolve in different ways, can lead to unequal nucleotide composition. This can cause inference methods to fail and phylogenies to be inaccurate. Recent advancements in phylogenetic theory have proposed new models of nonstationary sequence evolution; these models often outperform equivalent stationary models. A variety of new phylogenetic software implementing such models has been developed, but the studies employing the new methodology are still few. We discovered convergence of nucleotide composition within mitochondrial genomes of the insect order Coleoptera (beetles). We found variation in base content both among species and among genes in the genome. To this data set, we have applied a broad range of phylogenetic methods, including some traditional stationary models of evolution and all the more recent nonstationary models. We compare 8 inference methods applied to the same data set. Although the more commonly used methods universally fail to recover established clades, we find that some of the newer software packages are more appropriate for data of this nature. The software packages p4, PHASE, and nhPhyML were able to overcome the systematic bias in our data set, but parsimony, MrBayes, NJ, LogDet, and PhyloBayes were not.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheffield, N. C., Song, H., Cameron, S. L., Whiting, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp037</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>394</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>381</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/395?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Recent Long-Distance Dispersal Overshadows Ancient Biogeographical Patterns in a Pantropical Angiosperm Family (Simaroubaceae, Sapindales)]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/395?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Detailed biogeographic studies of pantropical clades are still relatively few, and those conducted to date typically use parsimony or event-based methods to reconstruct ancestral areas. In this study, a recently developed likelihood method for reconstructing ancestral areas (the dispersal&ndash;extinction cladogenesis [DEC] model) is applied to the angiosperm family Simaroubaceae, a geographically widespread and ecologically diverse clade of pantropical and temperate trees and shrubs. To estimate divergence dates in the family, Bayesian uncorrelated rates analyses and robust fossil calibrations are applied to the well-sampled and strongly supported phylogeny. For biogeographic analyses, the effects of parameter configurations in the DEC model are assessed for different possible ancestral ranges, and the likelihood method is compared with dispersal&ndash;vicariance analysis (DIVA). Regardless of the parameters used, likelihood analyses show a common pattern of multiple recent range shifts that overshadow reconstruction of events deeper in the family's history. DIVA produced results similar to the DEC model when ancestral ranges were restricted to two areas, but some improbable ancestral ranges were also observed. Simaroubaceae exhibit an early history of range expansion between major continental areas in the Northern Hemisphere, but reconstruction of ancestral areas for lineages diverging in the early Tertiary are sensitive to the parameters of the model used. A North American origin is suggested for the family, with migration via Beringia by ancestral taxa. In contrast to traditional views, long-distance dispersal events are common, particularly in the Late Oligocene and later. Notable dispersals are inferred to have occurred across the Atlantic Ocean in both directions, as well as between Africa and Asia, and around the Indian Ocean basin and Pacific islands.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clayton, J. W., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Recent Long-Distance Dispersal Overshadows Ancient Biogeographical Patterns in a Pantropical Angiosperm Family (Simaroubaceae, Sapindales)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>410</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>395</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/411?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Orthology Analysis]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/411?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Orthology analysis aims at identifying orthologous genes and gene products from different organisms and, therefore, is a powerful tool in modern computational and experimental biology. Although reconciliation-based orthology methods are generally considered more accurate than distance-based ones, the traditional parsimony-based implementation of reconciliation-based orthology analysis (most parsimonious reconciliation [MPR]) suffers from a number of shortcomings. For example, 1) it is limited to orthology predictions from the reconciliation that minimizes the number of gene duplication and loss events, 2) it cannot evaluate the support of this reconciliation in relation to the other reconciliations, and 3) it cannot make use of prior knowledge (e.g., about species divergence times) that provides auxiliary information for orthology predictions. We present a probabilistic approach to reconciliation-based orthology analysis that addresses all these issues by estimating orthology probabilities. The method is based on the gene evolution model, an explicit evolutionary model for gene duplication and gene loss inside a species tree, that generalizes the standard birth&ndash;death process. We describe the probabilistic approach to orthology analysis using 2 experimental data sets and show that the use of orthology probabilities allows a more informative analysis than MPR and, in particular, that it is less sensitive to taxon sampling problems. We generalize these anecdotal observations and show, using data generated under biologically realistic conditions, that MPR give false orthology predictions at a substantial frequency. Last, we provide a new orthology prediction method that allows an orthology and paralogy classification with any chosen sensitivity/specificity combination from the spectra of achievable combinations. We conclude that probabilistic orthology analysis is a strong and more advanced alternative to traditional orthology analysis and that it provides a framework for sophisticated comparative studies of processes in genome evolution.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sennblad, B., Lagergren, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp046</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Probabilistic Orthology Analysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>424</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>411</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/425?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experimental Design in Caecilian Systematics: Phylogenetic Information of Mitochondrial Genomes and Nuclear rag1]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/425?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In molecular phylogenetic studies, a major aspect of experimental design concerns the choice of markers and taxa. Although previous studies have investigated the phylogenetic performance of different genes and the effectiveness of increasing taxon sampling, their conclusions are partly contradictory, probably because they are highly context specific and dependent on the group of organisms used in each study. Goldman introduced a method for experimental design in phylogenetics based on the expected information to be gained that has barely been used in practice. Here we use this method to explore the phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial (mt) genes, mt genomes, and nuclear <I>rag1</I> for studies of the systematics of caecilian amphibians, as well as the effect of taxon addition on the stabilization of a controversial branch of the tree. Overall phylogenetic information estimates per gene, specific estimates per branch of the tree, estimates for combined (mitogenomic) data sets, and estimates as a hypothetical new taxon is added to different parts of the caecilian tree are calculated and compared. In general, the most informative data sets are those for mt transfer and ribosomal RNA genes. Our results also show at which positions in the caecilian tree the addition of taxa have the greatest potential to increase phylogenetic information with respect to the controversial relationships of <I>Scolecomorphus</I>, <I>Boulengerula</I>, and all other teresomatan caecilians. These positions are, as intuitively expected, mostly (but not all) adjacent to the controversial branch. Generating whole mitogenomic and <I>rag1</I> data for additional taxa joining the <I>Scolecomorphus</I> branch may be a more efficient strategy than sequencing a similar amount of additional nucleotides spread across the current caecilian taxon sampling. The methodology employed in this study allows an a priori evaluation and testable predictions of the appropriateness of particular experimental designs to solve specific questions at different levels of the caecilian phylogeny.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[San Mauro, D., Gower, D. J., Massingham, T., Wilkinson, M., Zardoya, R., Cotton, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp043</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experimental Design in Caecilian Systematics: Phylogenetic Information of Mitochondrial Genomes and Nuclear rag1]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>438</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>425</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Regular Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/439?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can mtDNA Barcodes Be Used to Delimit Species? A Response to Pons et al. (2006)]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/439?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lohse, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp039</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can mtDNA Barcodes Be Used to Delimit Species? A Response to Pons et al. (2006)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>442</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>439</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Points of View</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sampling Error Does Not Invalidate the Yule-Coalescent Model for Species Delimitation. A Response to Lohse (2009)]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Papadopoulou, A., Monaghan, M. T., Barraclough, T. G., Vogler, A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp038</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sampling Error Does Not Invalidate the Yule-Coalescent Model for Species Delimitation. A Response to Lohse (2009)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>444</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Points of View</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barcoding Bamboozled by Bacteria: Convergence to Metazoan Mitochondrial Primer Targets by Marine Microbes]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddall, M. E., Fontanella, F. M., Watson, S. C., Kvist, S., Erseus, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barcoding Bamboozled by Bacteria: Convergence to Metazoan Mitochondrial Primer Targets by Marine Microbes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>451</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Points of View</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/452?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Phylogenetic Analysis in the Anomaly Zone]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/452?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, L., Edwards, S. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Phylogenetic Analysis in the Anomaly Zone]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>460</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>452</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Points of View</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/461?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Timetree of Life]]></title>
<link>http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/58/4/461?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morrison, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:18:15 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syp042</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Timetree of Life]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Society of Systematic Biologists</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>58</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>462</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>461</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Book Review</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>