Skip Navigation


Systematic Biology Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2009
Systematic Biology 2009 58(1):35-54; doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/35    most recent
syp008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Degnan, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Degnan, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, N. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Society of Systematic Biologists

Properties of Consensus Methods for Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees

James H. Degnan1,4,*, Michael DeGiorgio2, David Bryant3 and Noah A. Rosenberg1,2

1 Department of Human Genetics, 1241 East Catherine Street, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0618, USA
2 Center for Computational Medicine and Biology, 2017 Palmer Commons, 100 Washtenaw Avenue, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2218, USA
3 Department of Mathematics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 29019, Auckland, New Zealand
4 Present address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand

* Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand; E-mail: J.Degnan{at}math.canterbury.ac.nz.


   Abstract

Consensus methods provide a useful strategy for summarizing information from a collection of gene trees. An important application of consensus methods is to combine gene trees to estimate a species tree. To investigate the theoretical properties of consensus trees that would be obtained from large numbers of loci evolving according to a basic evolutionary model, we construct consensus trees from rooted gene trees that occur in proportion to gene-tree probabilities derived from coalescent theory. We consider majority-rule, rooted triple (R*), and greedy consensus trees obtained from known, rooted gene trees, both in the asymptotic case as numbers of gene trees approach infinity and for finite numbers of genes. Our results show that for some combinations of species-tree branch lengths, increasing the number of independent loci can make the rooted majority-rule consensus tree more likely to be at least partially unresolved. However, the probability that the R* consensus tree has the species-tree topology approaches 1 as the number of gene trees approaches {infty}. Although the greedy consensus algorithm can be the quickest to converge on the correct species-tree topology when increasing the number of gene trees, it can also be positively misleading. The majority-rule consensus tree is not a misleading estimator of the species-tree topology, and the R* consensus tree is a statistically consistent estimator of the species-tree topology. Our results therefore suggest a method for using multiple loci to infer the species-tree topology, even when it is discordant with the most likely gene tree.

Keywords: Anomalous gene tree; coalescence; discordance; lineage sorting; phylogenetics; statistical consistency

Received April 17, 2008; Revised July 7, 2008; Accepted October 22, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
H. Huang and L. L. Knowles
What Is the Danger of the Anomaly Zone for Empirical Phylogenetics?
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. Liu and S. V. Edwards
Phylogenetic Analysis in the Anomaly Zone
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 452 - 460.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.