Skip Navigation


Systematic Biology Advance Access originally published online on May 28, 2009
Systematic Biology 2009 58(1):1-20; doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/1/1    most recent
syp005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spinks, P. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, H. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spinks, P. Q.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, H. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Society of Systematic Biologists

Conflicting Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies for the Widely Disjunct Emys (Testudines: Emydidae) Species Complex, and What They Tell Us about Biogeography and Hybridization

Phillip Q. Spinks* and H. Bradley Shaffer

Department of Evolution and Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

* Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; E-mail: pqspinks{at}ucdavis.edu.


  Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms by which widely disjunct members of a clade came to occupy their current distribution is one of the fundamental challenges of biogeography. Here, we used data from 7 nuclear and 1 mitochondrial gene to examine the phylogenetic and biogeographic history of Emys, a clade of turtles that is broadly disjunct in western and eastern North America and Europe. We found strong disagreement between mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees, with mitochondrial DNA supporting the monophyly of the North American taxa (marmorata + blandingii) to the exclusion of the European orbicularis, and nuclear genes supporting the monophyly of (blandingii + orbicularis) to the exclusion of marmorata. We used fossil-calibrated molecular chronograms, in combination with supporting evidence from the fossil record and paleoclimatology, to identify a potential example of ancient hybridization and mitochondrial gene capture 12 million years ago, which explains this discrepancy. Based on the weight of evidence, we argue that the invasion of Eurasia by Emys orbicularis occurred about 16 Ma via a trans-Beringian land bridge. The case of Emys emphasizes how single-gene trees can be strongly affected by population processes, including hybridization, and that the effects of these processes can persist through long periods of evolutionary history. Given the chaotic state of the current taxonomy of these turtles, our work also emphasizes the care that should be used in implementing taxonomic changes based on 1 or a few gene trees and the importance of taking a conservative approach in renaming or splitting higher taxa based on apparent nonmonophyly.

Keywords: Actinemys; Clemmys; Emydoidea; Emys; HNF-1{alpha}; nuclear phylogeny; R35; RELN

Received November 2, 2007; Revised February 7, 2008; Accepted November 21, 2008

Associate Editor: Elizabeth Jockusch


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
L. S. Kubatko
Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 478 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.