Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(5):693-707; doi:10.1080/10635150802426473
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roalson, E. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Roalson, E. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

A Comparative Study in Ancestral Range Reconstruction Methods: Retracing the Uncertain Histories of Insular Lineages

John R. Clark1,5, Richard H. Ree2, Michael E. Alfaro1, Matthew G. King3, Warren L. Wagner4 and Eric H. Roalson1

1 School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University P.O. Box 644236, Pullman, Washington 99164-4236, USA; johnrobertclark{at}gmail.com (J.R.C.)
2 Botany Department, Field Museum of Natural History 1400 S Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60605, USA
3 Deparment of Botany, University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
4 Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 20013, USA
5 Center for Tropical Plant Science and Conservation, Marie Selby Botanical Gardens 811 S. Palm Avenue, Sarasota, Florida 34236, USA

Edited by Susanne Renner


   Abstract

Island systems have long been useful models for understanding lineage diversification in a geographic context, especially pertaining to the importance of dispersal in the origin of new clades. Here we use a well-resolved phylogeny of the flowering plant genus Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) from the Pacific Islands to compare four methods of inferring ancestral geographic ranges in islands: two developed for character-state reconstruction that allow only single-island ranges and do not explicitly associate speciation with range evolution (Fitch parsimony [FP; parsimony-based] and stochastic mapping [SM; likelihood-based]) and two methods developed specifically for ancestral range reconstruction, in which widespread ranges (spanning islands) are integral to inferences about speciation scenarios (dispersal-vicariance analysis [DIVA; parsimony-based] and dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis [DEC; likelihood-based]). The methods yield conflicting results, which we interpret in light of their respective assumptions. FP exhibits the least power to unequivocally reconstruct ranges, likely due to a combination of having flat (uninformative) transition costs and not using branch length information. SM reconstructions generally agree with a prior hypothesis about dispersal-driven speciation across the Pacific, despite the conceptual mismatch between its character-based model and this mode of range evolution. In contrast with narrow extant ranges for species of Cyrtandra, DIVA reconstructs broad ancestral ranges at many nodes. DIVA results also conflict with geological information on island ages; we attribute these conflicts to the parsimony criterion not considering branch lengths or time, as well as vicariance being the sole means of divergence for widespread ancestors. DEC analyses incorporated geological information on island ages and allowed prior hypotheses about range size and dispersal rates to be evaluated in a likelihood framework and gave more nuanced inferences about range evolution and the geography of speciation than other methods tested. However, ancestral ranges at several nodes could not be conclusively resolved, due possibly to uncertainty in the phylogeny or the relative complexity of the underlying model. Of the methods tested, SM and DEC both converge on plausible hypotheses for area range histories in Cyrtandra, due in part to the consideration of branch lengths and/or timing of events. We suggest that DEC model-based methods for ancestral range inference could be improved by adopting a Bayesian SM approach, in which stochastic sampling of complete geographic histories could be integrated over alternative phylogenetic topologies. Likelihood-based estimates of ancestral ranges for Cyrtandra suggest a major dispersal route into the Pacific through the islands of Fiji and Samoa, motivating future biogeographic investigation of this poorly known region.

Keywords: Ancestral range reconstruction; Bayesian inference; Cyrtandra; dispersal-mediated allopatry; Gesneriaceae; likelihood methods; stochastic mapping. dispersal; vicariance

Received February 20, 2008; Revised April 14, 2008; Accepted July 9, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. Escudero, V. Valcarcel, P. Vargas, and M. Luceno
Significance of ecological vicariance and long-distance dispersal in the diversification of Carex sect. Spirostachyae (Cyperaceae)
Am. J. Botany, November 1, 2009; 96(11): 2100 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Balke, I. Ribera, L. Hendrich, M. A. Miller, K. Sagata, A. Posman, A. P. Vogler, and R. Meier
New Guinea highland origin of a widespread arthropod supertramp
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2359 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.