Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(4):628-646; doi:10.1080/10635150802302443
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bond, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stockman, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bond, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Stockman, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

An Integrative Method for Delimiting Cohesion Species: Finding the Population-Species Interface in a Group of Californian Trapdoor Spiders with Extreme Genetic Divergence and Geographic Structuring

Jason E. Bond and Amy K. Stockman

Department of Biology, East Carolina University Greenville, North Carolina 27858, USA; E-mail: bondja{at}ecu.edu (J.E.B.)

Edited by Jack Sullivan


   Abstract

Here we present an objective, repeatable approach to delineating species when populations are divergent and highly structured geographically using the Californian trapdoor spider species complex Aptostichus atomarius Simon as a model system. This system is particularly difficult because under strict criteria of geographical concordance coupled with estimates of genetic divergence, an unrealistic number of population lineages would qualify as species (20 to 60). Our novel phylogeographic approach, which is generally applicable but particularly relevant to highly structured systems, uses genealogical exclusivity to establish a topological framework to examine lineages for genetic and ecological exchangeability in an effort to delimit cohesion species. Both qualitative assessments of habitat and niche-based distribution modeling are employed to evaluate selective regime and ecological interchangeability among genetic lineages; adaptive divergence among populations is weighted more heavily than simple geographical concordance. Based on these analyses we conclude that five cohesion species should be recognized, three of which are new to science.

Keywords: Aptostichus stephencolberti; Cohesion species; DNA barcoding; ecological interchangeability; Mygalomorphae; niche-based distribution modeling; species delineation

Received December 7, 2007; Revised February 13, 2008; Accepted April 24, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. D. Leache
Species Tree Discordance Traces to Phylogeographic Clade Boundaries in North American Fence Lizards (Sceloporus)
Syst Biol, December 1, 2009; 58(6): 547 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Leache, M. S. Koo, C. L. Spencer, T. J. Papenfuss, R. N. Fisher, and J. A. McGuire
From the Cover: Quantifying ecological, morphological, and genetic variation to delimit species in the coast horned lizard species complex (Phrynosoma)
PNAS, July 28, 2009; 106(30): 12418 - 12423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. A. Blackledge, N. Scharff, J. A. Coddington, T. Szuts, J. W. Wenzel, C. Y. Hayashi, and I. Agnarsson
Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era
PNAS, March 31, 2009; 106(13): 5229 - 5234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.