Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(3):483-498; doi:10.1080/10635150802172184
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schardl, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schardl, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Yoshida, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

A Novel Test for Host-Symbiont Codivergence Indicates Ancient Origin of Fungal Endophytes in Grasses

C. L. Schardl1, K. D. Craven2, S. Speakman3, A. Stromberg3, A. Lindstrom3 and R. Yoshida3

1 Department of Plant Pathology 201F PSB, 1405 Veterans Drive, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40546-0312, USA
2 Plant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, OK 73401, USA
3 Department of Statistics, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40526-0027, USA; E-mail: ruriko{at}ms.uky.edu (R.Y.) C.L.S., K.D.C., S.S. and R.Y. contributed equally to this work

Edited by Roderic Page, Jack Sullivan


   Abstract

Significant phylogenetic codivergence between plant or animal hosts (H) and their symbionts or parasites (P) indicates the importance of their interactions on evolutionary time scales. However, valid and realistic methods to test for codivergence are not fully developed. One of the systems where possible codivergence has been of interest involves the large subfamily of temperate grasses (Pooideae) and their endophytic fungi (epichloae). These widespread symbioses often help protect host plants from herbivory and stresses and affect species diversity and food web structures. Here we introduce the MRCALink (most-recent-common-ancestor link) method and use it to investigate the possibility of grass-epichloë codivergence. MRCALink applied to ultrametric H and P trees identifies all corresponding nodes for pairwise comparisons of MRCA ages. The result is compared to the space of random H and P tree pairs estimated by a Monte Carlo method. Compared to tree reconciliation, the method is less dependent on tree topologies (which often can be misleading), and it crucially improves on phylogeny-independent methods such as ParaFit or the Mantel test by eliminating an extreme (but previously unrecognized) distortion of node-pair sampling. Analysis of 26 grass species-epichloë species symbioses did not reject random association of H and P MRCA ages. However, when five obvious host jumps were removed, the analysis significantly rejected random association and supported grass-endophyte codivergence. Interestingly, early cladogenesis events in the Pooideae corresponded to early cladogenesis events in epichloae, suggesting concomitant origins of this grass subfamily and its remarkable group of symbionts. We also applied our method to the well-known gopher-louse data set.

Keywords: Coevolution; endophytes; grasses; phylogenetic trees

Received October 6, 2007; Revised December 5, 2007; Accepted March 6, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Hommola, J. E. Smith, Y. Qiu, and W. R. Gilks
A Permutation Test of Host-Parasite Cospeciation
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2009; 26(7): 1457 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.