Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(2):311-317; doi:10.1080/10635150802033022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Asher, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Villagra, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Asher, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sánchez-Villagra, M. R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

Morphology, Paleontology, and Placental Mammal Phylogeny

Edited by Mark Hafner

Robert J. Asher1, Jonathan H. Geisler2 and Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra3

1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge Downing Street, CB2 3EJ, UK; E-mail: r.asher@zoo.cam.ac.uk
2 Department of Geology & Geography, Georgia Southern University Statesboro, Georgia 30460 USA; E-mail: geislerj@georgiasouthern.edu
3 Palaeontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich Karl Schmid-Straße 4, CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland; E-mail: m.sanchez@pim.uzh.ch

Received September 23, 2007; Revised November 23, 2007; Accepted January 13, 2008
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Placental mammals constitute the most intensively studied large clade of organisms. Deciphering their relationships has important implications not only to understand evolutionary processes (Bininda-Emonds et al., 2007) but also to inform many aspects of biomedical research (Springer and Murphy, 2007). Springer et al. (2007) have recently discussed limitations of morphological analysis of placental phylogeny compared with reconstructions based on molecular data. They presented a pessimistic view of the potential of morphological characters for use in high-level placental mammal phylogeny reconstruction, as the morphological data set they scrutinized (from Asher et al., 2003) does not recover the four major clades of mammals (Afrotheria, Xenarthra, Laurasiatheria, and Euarchontoglires) that these authors regard as overwhelmingly supported.

In their contribution to the recurring debate on the "adequacy of morphology" (from their title), Springer et al. (2007) have provided empirical data to support their claims of the inadequacy of a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Congruence and the "True" Mammalian Tree
 

    Generalization across Morphological Data Sets
 

    Data Rarefaction and Emulating Extinction
 

    The Role of Paleontology in Eutherian Systematics
 

    Conclusion: Have We Exhausted Morphology-Based Studies of Phylogeny in Placentals?
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. S. Springer, R. W. Meredith, E. Eizirik, E. Teeling, and W. J. Murphy
Morphology and Placental Mammal Phylogeny
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 499 - 503.
[Full Text] [PDF]