Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(6):879-886; doi:10.1080/10635150701701083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Queiroz, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by De Queiroz, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Species Concepts and Species Delimitation

Kevin De Queiroz

Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC, 20560-0162, USA E-mail: dequeirozk{at}si.edu

Edited by John Weins: Guest Associate Editor


   Abstract

The issue of species delimitation has long been confused with that of species conceptualization, leading to a half century of controversy concerning both the definition of the species category and methods for inferring the boundaries and numbers of species. Alternative species concepts agree in treating existence as a separately evolving metapopulation lineage as the primary defining property of the species category, but they disagree in adopting different properties acquired by lineages during the course of divergence (e.g., intrinsic reproductive isolation, diagnosability, monophyly) as secondary defining properties (secondary species criteria). A unified species concept can be achieved by treating existence as a separately evolving metapopulation lineage as the only necessary property of species and the former secondary species criteria as different lines of evidence (operational criteria) relevant to assessing lineage separation. This unified concept of species has several consequences for species delimitation, including the following: First, the issues of species conceptualization and species delimitation are clearly separated; the former secondary species criteria are no longer considered relevant to species conceptualization but only to species delimitation. Second, all of the properties formerly treated as secondary species criteria are relevant to species delimitation to the extent that they provide evidence of lineage separation. Third, the presence of any one of the properties (if appropriately interpreted) is evidence for the existence of a species, though more properties and thus more lines of evidence are associated with a higher degree of corroboration. Fourth, and perhaps most significantly, a unified species concept shifts emphasis away from the traditional species criteria, encouraging biologists to develop new methods of species delimitation that are not tied to those properties.

Keywords: Species concept; species criteria; species delimitation

Received November 1, 2006; Revised January 16, 2007; Accepted August 21, 2007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. C. O'Meara
New Heuristic Methods for Joint Species Delimitation and Species Tree Inference
Syst Biol, November 10, 2009; (2009) syp077v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
G. Sangster
Increasing numbers of bird species result from taxonomic progress, not taxonomic inflation
Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2009; 276(1670): 3185 - 3191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
W.F. Doolittle
Eradicating Typological Thinking in Prokaryotic Systematics and Evolution
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, August 10, 2009; (2009) sqb.2009.74.002v1.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. D. Leache, M. S. Koo, C. L. Spencer, T. J. Papenfuss, R. N. Fisher, and J. A. McGuire
From the Cover: Quantifying ecological, morphological, and genetic variation to delimit species in the coast horned lizard species complex (Phrynosoma)
PNAS, July 28, 2009; 106(30): 12418 - 12423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
P. M. Oliver, M. Adams, M. S.Y. Lee, M. N. Hutchinson, and P. Doughty
Cryptic diversity in vertebrates: molecular data double estimates of species diversity in a radiation of Australian lizards (Diplodactylus, Gekkota)
Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2009; 276(1664): 2001 - 2007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. M. Spooner
DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1177 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. A. Baum
Species as Ranked Taxa
Syst Biol, May 19, 2009; (2009) syp011v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
W. F. Doolittle and O. Zhaxybayeva
On the origin of prokaryotic species
Genome Res., May 1, 2009; 19(5): 744 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Heo, L. Kang, and E. I. Shakhnovich
Emergence of species in evolutionary "simulated annealing"
PNAS, February 10, 2009; 106(6): 1869 - 1874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.