Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(6):1011-1021; doi:10.1080/10635150701656352
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolsan, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolsan, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Naming Species in Phylogenetic Nomenclature

Edited by Mark Fishbein: Associate Editor Jack Sulliavan Editor

Mieczyslaw Wolsan

1 Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences Wilcza 64, 00-679, Warszawa, Poland E-mail: wolsan@miiz.waw.pl

Received January 22, 2007; Revised March 9, 2007; Accepted July 5, 2007
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Phylogenetic nomenclature (PN) is a rank-free system of biological nomenclature, designed to name species and clades (de Queiroz and Gauthier, 1990, 1992, 1994; Cantino and de Queiroz, 2006). In this system, the categories species and clade are not taxonomic ranks but different kinds of biological entities. A species is an individuated segment of a metapopulation-level lineage. A clade is a complete system of ancestry and descent, consisting of an ancestor (such as a species, population, or organism) and all its descendants (de Queiroz, 1998, 1999, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c; Cantino and de Queiroz, 2006). Both are historical entities that compose the Tree of Life, viewed as concrete individuals rather than abstract classes in the ontological sense (but see, e.g., Lee and Wolsan [2002] for a notion of the ontological distinction between synchronic individuals and diachronic historical entities). As existing . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Desirable Features of Species Names
 
Uniqueness
Stability
Distinguishability from Clade Names
Consistency of Form among Species Names
Consistency of Form with the Linnaean Binomen
Consistency of Species Names between PN and TN
Ease of Pronunciation, Brevity, and Simplicity of Form
No Need for Conversion

    Evaluation of Naming Methods
 
Methods S versus T

    Conclusion
 

    Appendix 1. Descriptions and Examples of Methods for Naming Species in Phylogenetic Nomenclature (PN)
 
Method A
Description
Example
Reference
Method B
Description
Example
Reference
Method C
Description
Example
Reference
Method D
Description
Example
Reference
Method E
Description
Example
Reference
Method F
Description
Example
Reference
Method G
Description
Example
Reference
Method H
Description
Example
Reference
Method I
Description
Example
Reference
Method J
Description
Example
Reference
Method K
Description
Example
Reference
Method L
Description
Example
Reference
Method M
Description
Example
Reference
Method N
Description
Example
Reference
Method O
Description
Example
Reference
Method P
Description
Example
Reference
Method Q
Description
Examples
Reference
Method R
Description
Examples
Reference
Method S
Description
Example
Reference
Method T
Description
Example
Reference

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. A. Baum
Species as Ranked Taxa
Syst Biol, May 19, 2009; (2009) syp011v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. Dayrat, P. D. Cantino, J. A. Clarke, and K. de Queiroz
Species Names in the PhyloCode: The Approach Adopted by the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 507 - 514.
[Full Text] [PDF]