Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(5):776-797; doi:10.1080/10635150701618527
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benavides, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sites, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benavides, E.
Right arrow Articles by Sites, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Molecular Phylogenetics of the Lizard Genus Microlophus (Squamata:Tropiduridae): Aligning and Retrieving Indel Signal from Nuclear Introns

Edgar Benavides1, Rebecca Baum3, David McClellan1 and Jack W. Sites1,2

1 Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University Provo, UT, 84602, USA E-mail: eb235{at}email.byu.edu
2 M.L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University Provo, UT, 84602, USA
3 Department of Chemistry, Brigham Young University Provo, UT, 84602, USA

Edited by Karl Kjer


   Abstract

We use a multigene data set (the mitochondrial locus and nine nuclear gene regions) to test phylogenetic relationships in the South American "lava lizards" (genus Microlophus) and describe a strategy for aligning noncoding sequences that accounts for differences in tempo and class of mutational events. We focus on seven nuclear introns that vary in size and frequency of multibase length mutations (i.e., indels) and present a manual alignment strategy that incorporates insertions and deletions (indels) for each intron. Our method is based on mechanistic explanations of intron evolution that does not require a guide tree. We also use a progressive alignment algorithm (Probabilistic Alignment Kit; PRANK) and distinguishes insertions from deletions and avoids the "gapcost" conundrum. We describe an approach to selecting a guide tree purged of ambiguously aligned regions and use this to refine PRANK performance. We show that although manual alignment is successful in finding repeat motifs and the most obvious indels, some regions can only be subjectively aligned, and there are limits to the size and complexity of a data matrix for which this approach can be taken. PRANK alignments identified more parsimony-informative indels while simultaneously increasing nucleotide identity in conserved sequence blocks flanking the indel regions. When comparing manual and PRANK with two widely used methods (CLUSTAL, MUSCLE) for the alignment of the most length-variable intron, only PRANK recovered a tree congruent at deeper nodes with the combined data tree inferred from all nuclear gene regions. We take this concordance as an objective function of alignment quality and present a strongly supported phylogenetic hypothesis for Microlophus relationships. From this hypothesis we show that (1) a coded indel data partition derived from the PRANK alignment contributed significantly to nodal support and (2) the indel data set permitted detection of significant conflict between mitochondrial and nuclear data partitions, which we hypothesize arose from secondary contact of distantly related taxa, followed by hybridization and mtDNA introgression.

Keywords: Indels; length-variable introns; Microlophus; mitochondrial-nuclear conflict; phylogenetics; progressive alignment; secondary contact

Received June 9, 2006; Revised August 26, 2006; Accepted July 5, 2007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. A. Morrison
Why Would Phylogeneticists Ignore Computerized Sequence Alignment?
Syst Biol, March 25, 2009; (2009) syp009v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
C. E Parent, A. Caccone, and K. Petren
Colonization and diversification of Galapagos terrestrial fauna: a phylogenetic and biogeographical synthesis
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 27, 2008; 363(1508): 3347 - 3361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.