© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists
Within-Species Variation and Measurement Error in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods
1 Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA E-mail: arives{at}wisc.edu
2 Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA
3 Department of Biology, University of California Riverside, California 92521, USA E-mail: tgarland{at}ucr.edu
Edited by Todd Oakley: Associate Editor
 |
Abstract |
|---|
Most phylogenetically based statistical methods for the analysis of quantitative or continuously varying phenotypic traits assume that variation within species is absent or at least negligible, which is unrealistic for many traits. Within-species variation has several components. Differences among populations of the same species may represent either phylogenetic divergence or direct effects of environmental factors that differ among populations (phenotypic plasticity). Within-population variation also contributes to within-species variation and includes sampling variation, instrument-related error, low repeatability caused by fluctuations in behavioral or physiological state, variation related to age, sex, season, or time of day, and individual variation within such categories. Here we develop techniques for analyzing phylogenetically correlated data to include within-species variation, or "measurement error" as it is often termed in the statistical literature. We derive methods for (i) univariate analyses, including measurement of "phylogenetic signal," (ii) correlation and principal components analysis for multiple traits, (iii) multiple regression, and (iv) inference of "functional relations," such as reduced major axis (RMA) regression. The methods are capable of incorporating measurement error that differs for each data point (mean value for a species or population), but they can be modified for special cases in which less is known about measurement error (e.g., when one is willing to assume something about the ratio of measurement error in two traits). We show that failure to incorporate measurement error can lead to both biased and imprecise (unduly uncertain) parameter estimates. Even previous methods that are thought to account for measurement error, such as conventional RMA regression, can be improved by explicitly incorporating measurement error and phylogenetic correlation. We illustrate these methods with examples and simulations and provide Matlab programs.
Keywords: Ancestor reconstruction; comparative methods; estimated generalized least-squares; independent contrasts; maximum likelihood; morphometrics; principal components analysis; reduced major axis; regression; restricted maximum likelihood
Received October 27, 2005; Revised February 26, 2006; Accepted October 16, 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. R. Ives and T. Garland Jr. Phylogenetic Logistic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables Syst Biol, November 4, 2009; (2009) syp074v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Z. Garamszegi, S. Calhim, N. Dochtermann, G. Hegyi, P. L. Hurd, C. Jorgensen, N. Kutsukake, M. J. Lajeunesse, K. A. Pollard, H. Schielzeth, et al. Changing philosophies and tools for statistical inferences in behavioral ecology Behav. Ecol., November 2, 2009; (2009) arp137v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. T. J. Johnson, S. D. Smith, and M. D. Rausher Plant and Insect Biodiversity Special Feature: Plant sex and the evolution of plant defenses against herbivores PNAS, October 27, 2009; 106(43): 18079 - 18084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. H. Eng, H. C. Bravo, and S. Keles A Phylogenetic Mixture Model for the Evolution of Gene Expression Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2009; 26(10): 2363 - 2372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Bruggeman, J. Heringa, and B. W. Brandt PhyloPars: estimation of missing parameter values using phylogeny Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W179 - W184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. B. Huey, C. A. Deutsch, J. J. Tewksbury, L. J. Vitt, P. E. Hertz, H. J. Alvarez Perez, and T. Garland Jr Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2009; 276(1664): 1939 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. P Freckleton and W. Jetz Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data Proc R Soc B, January 7, 2009; 276(1654): 21 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Revell, L. J. Harmon, and D. C. Collar Phylogenetic Signal, Evolutionary Process, and Rate Syst Biol, August 1, 2008; 57(4): 591 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|