Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(2):194-205; doi:10.1080/10635150701291804
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lang, B. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Accounting for Gene Rate Heterogeneity in Phylogenetic Inference

Rachel B. Bevan1, David Bryant3 and B. Franz Lang2

1 McGill Centre for Bioinformatics, McGill University Duff Medical Building, 3775 University Street, Montréal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada E-mail: rbbevan{at}gmail.com
2 Program in Evolutionary Biology, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Centre Robert Cedergren, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal 2900 Boulevard Edouard–Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1J4, Canada
3 Department of Mathematics, The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland New Zealand

Edited by Tim Collins: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Traditionally, phylogenetic analyses over many genes combine data into a contiguous block. Under this concatenated model, all genes are assumed to evolve at the same rate. However, it is clear that genes evolve at very different rates and that accounting for this rate heterogeneity is important if we are to accurately infer phylogenies from heterogeneous multigene data sets. There remain open questions regarding how best to incorporate gene rate parameters into phylogenetic models and which properties of real data correlate with improved fit over the concatenated model. In this study, two methods of accounting for gene rate heterogeneity are compared: the n-parameter method, which allows for each of the n gene partitions to have a gene rate parameter, and the {alpha}-parameter method, which fits a distribution to the gene rates. Results demonstrate that the n-parameter method is both computationally faster and in general provides a better fit over the concatenated model than the {alpha}-parameter method. Furthermore, improved model fit over the concatenated model is highly correlated with the presence of a gene with a slow relative rate of evolution.

Keywords: AIC; gene rates; phylogenetic integration; phylogenomics; rate heterogeneity

Received April 4, 2006; Revised June 20, 2006; Accepted October 15, 2006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. C. Sheffield, H. Song, S. L. Cameron, and M. F. Whiting
Nonstationary Evolution and Compositional Heterogeneity in Beetle Mitochondrial Phylogenomics
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 381 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
F. Cheng, S. Hartmann, M. Gupta, J. G. Ibrahim, and T. J. Vision
A hierarchical model for incomplete alignments in phylogenetic inference
Bioinformatics, March 1, 2009; 25(5): 592 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.