Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(2):163-181; doi:10.1080/10635150701258787
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Syring, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liston, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Syring, J.
Right arrow Articles by Liston, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Widespread Genealogical Nonmonophyly in Species of Pinus Subgenus Strobus

John Syring1,*, Kathleen Farrell2, Roman Businsky3, Richard Cronn4 and Aaron Liston2

1 Department of Biological and Physical Sciences, Montana State University–Billings Billings, Montana 59101, USA
2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA E-mail: listona{at}science.oregonstate.edu
3 Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening Pruhonice, Czech Republic
4 Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA

Edited by Vincent Savolainen: Associate Editor

* Corresponding author: John Syring. E-mail: jsyring{at}msubillings.edu


   Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among Pinus species from subgenus Strobus remain unresolved despite combined efforts based on nrITS and cpDNA. To provide greater resolution among these taxa, a 900-bp intron from a late embryogenesis abundant (LEA)-like gene (IFG8612)was sequenced from 39 pine species, with two or more alleles representing 33 species. Nineteen of 33 species exhibited allelic nonmonphyly in the strict consensus tree, and 10 deviated significantly from allelic monophyly based on topology incongruence tests. Intraspecific nucleotide diversity ranged from 0.0 to 0.0211, and analysis of variance shows that nucleotide diversity was strongly associated (P < 0.0001)with the degree of species monophyly. Although species nonmonophyly complicates phylogenetic interpretations, this nuclear locus offers greater topological support than previously observed for cpDNA or nrITS. Lacking evidence for hybridization, recombination, or imperfect taxonomy, we feel that incomplete lineage sorting remains the best explanation for the polymorphisms shared among species. Depending on the species, coalescent expectations indicate that reciprocal monophyly will be more likely than paraphyly in 1.71 to 24.0 x 106 years, and that complete genome-wide coalescence in these species may require up to 76.3 x 106 years. The absence of allelic coalescence is a severe constraint in the application of phylogenetic methods in Pinus, and taxa sharing similar life history traits with Pinus are likely to show species nonmonophyly using nuclear markers.

Keywords: Lineage sorting; monophyly; nonmonophyly; nuclear genes; pinaceae; Pinus; phylogeny

Received February 14, 2006; Revised May 8, 2006; Accepted September 5, 2006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. L. Fulton and C. Strobeck
Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line
Proc R Soc B, November 25, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1783v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. A. Dragon and D. S. Barrington
Systematics of the Carex aquatilis and C. lenticularis lineages: Geographically and ecologically divergent sister clades of Carex section Phacocystis (Cyperaceae)
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2009; 96(10): 1896 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
I. J. Maureira-Butler, B. E. Pfeil, A. Muangprom, T. C. Osborn, and J. J. Doyle
The Reticulate History of Medicago (Fabaceae)
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 466 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.