© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists
DNA Barcoding and Taxonomy in Diptera: A Tale of High Intraspecific Variability and Low Identification Success
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore E-mail: dbsmr{at}nus.edu.sg (R.M.)
Edited by Marshal Hedin: Associate Editor
 |
Abstract |
|---|
DNA barcoding and DNA taxonomy have recently been proposed as solutions to the crisis of taxonomy and received significant attention from scientific journals, grant agencies, natural history museums, and mainstream media. Here, we test two key claims of molecular taxonomy using 1333 mitochondrial COI sequences for 449 species of Diptera. We investigate whether sequences can be used for species identification ("DNA barcoding") and find a relatively low success rate (< 70%) based on tree-based and newly proposed species identification criteria. Misidentifications are due to wide overlap between intra- and interspecific genetic variability, which causes 6.5% of all query sequences to have allospecific or a mixture of allo- and conspecific (3.6%) best-matching barcodes. Even when two COI sequences are identical, there is a 6% chance that they belong to different species. We also find that 21% of all species lack unique barcodes when consensus sequences of all conspecific sequences are used. Lastly, we test whether DNA sequences yield an unambiguous species-level taxonomy when sequence profiles are assembled based on pairwise distance thresholds. We find many sequence triplets for which two of the three pairwise distances remain below the threshold, whereas the third exceeds it; i.e., it is impossible to consistently delimit species based on pairwise distances. Furthermore, for species profiles based on a 3% threshold, only 47% of all profiles are consistent with currently accepted species limits, 20% contain more than one species, and 33% only some sequences from one species; i.e., adopting such a DNA taxonomy would require the redescription of a large proportion of the known species, thus worsening the taxonomic impediment. We conclude with an outlook on the prospects of obtaining complete barcode databases and the future use of DNA sequences in a modern integrative taxonomy.
Keywords: Cytochrome oxidase I; genetic distance; pairwise distance; species identification
Received September 6, 2005; Revised December 9, 2005; Accepted April 7, 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. T. Monaghan, R. Wild, M. Elliot, T. Fujisawa, M. Balke, D. J.G. Inward, D. C. Lees, R. Ranaivosolo, P. Eggleton, T. G. Barraclough, et al. Accelerated Species Inventory on Madagascar Using Coalescent-Based Models of Species Delineation Syst Biol, July 1, 2009; (2009) syp027v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. M. Spooner DNA barcoding will frequently fail in complicated groups: An example in wild potatoes Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2009; 96(6): 1177 - 1189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N.B. Barr, A. Cook, P. Elder, J. Molongoski, D. Prasher, and D.G. Robinson Application of a DNA barcode using the 16S rRNA gene to diagnose pest Arion species in the USA J. Mollus. Stud., May 1, 2009; 75(2): 187 - 191. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Meier, G. Zhang, and F. Ali The Use of Mean Instead of Smallest Interspecific Distances Exaggerates the Size of the "Barcoding Gap" and Leads to Misidentification Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 809 - 813. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Papadopoulou, J. Bergsten, T. Fujisawa, M. T Monaghan, T. G Barraclough, and A. P Vogler Speciation and DNA barcodes: testing the effects of dispersal on the formation of discrete sequence clusters Phil Trans R Soc B, September 27, 2008; 363(1506): 2987 - 2996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. B. Zhang, D. S. Sikes, C. Muster, and S. Q. Li Inferring Species Membership Using DNA Sequences with Back-Propagation Neural Networks Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 202 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Ross, S. Murugan, and W. L. Sibon Li Testing the Reliability of Genetic Methods of Species Identification via Simulation Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 216 - 230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Wiens Species Delimitation: New Approaches for Discovering Diversity Syst Biol, December 1, 2007; 56(6): 875 - 878. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. L. Knowles and B. C. Carstens Delimiting Species without Monophyletic Gene Trees Syst Biol, December 1, 2007; 56(6): 887 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Elias, R. I Hill, K. R Willmott, K. K Dasmahapatra, A. V.Z Brower, J. Mallet, and C. D Jiggins Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2007; 274(1627): 2881 - 2889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|