© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists
The Phylogeny of Early Eureptiles: Comparing Parsimony and Bayesian Approaches in the Investigation of a Basal Fossil Clade
1 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Museum für Naturkunde D-10099, Berlin, Germany E-mail: johannes.mueller{at}museum.hu-berlin.de
2 Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada
Edited by Mike Lee: Associate Editor
 |
Abstract |
|---|
For the first time the phylogenetic relationships of early eureptiles, consisting of captorhinids, diapsids, and protorothyridids, are investigated in a modern phylogenetic context using both parsimony and Bayesian approaches. Ninety parsimony-informative characters and 25 taxa were included in the analyses. The Bayesian analysis was run with and without a gamma-shape parameter allowing for variable rates across characters. In addition, we ran two more Bayesian analyses that included 42 autapomorphies and thus parsimony-uninformative characters in order to test the effect of variable branch lengths. The different analyses largely converged to the same topology, suggesting that the "protorothyridid" Coelostegus is the sister taxon of all other eureptiles and that the remaining "protorothyridids" are paraphyletic. Also, there is a close relationship between diapsids and Anthracodromeus, Cephalerpeton, and Protorothyris, a grouping of Thuringothyris with captorhinids, and a variable position of the "protorothyridids" Brouffia, Hylonomus, and Paleothyris. The lack of resolution in some parts of the tree might be due to "hard polytomies" and short divergence times between the respective taxa. The tree topology is consistent with the hypothesis that the temporal fenestrations of diapsid reptiles appear to be the consequence of a more lightly built skeleton, indicating a significant ecological shift in the early stages of diapsid evolution. Bayesian analysis is a very useful additional approach in studies of fossil taxa in which more traditional statistical support like the bootstrap is often weak. However, the exclusive use of the Mk model appears suitable only if autapomorphic characters are included, whereas the Mk+gamma model performed well with or without autapomorphies.
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Captorhinidae; Diapsida; Eureptilia; fossil taxa; morphological characters; parsimony; Protorothyrididae
Received January 10, 2006; Accepted February 22, 2006
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. P. Modesto, D. M. Scott, and R. R. Reisz Arthropod remains in the oral cavities of fossil reptiles support inference of early insectivory Biol Lett, December 23, 2009; 5(6): 838 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. B. Frobisch and R. R. Schoch Testing the Impact of Miniaturization on Phylogeny: Paleozoic Dissorophoid Amphibians Syst Biol, July 3, 2009; (2009) syp029v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Clarke and K. M. Middleton Mosaicism, Modules, and the Evolution of Birds: Results from a Bayesian Approach to the Study of Morphological Evolution Using Discrete Character Data Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 185 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|