Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(3):471-484; doi:10.1080/10635150600697465
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buschbom, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buschbom, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Evolutionary History of Vegetative Reproduction in Porpidia s.l. (Lichen-Forming Ascomycota)

Jutta Buschbom1,2,{dagger} and Daniel Barker3,4

1 University of Chicago, Committee on Evolutionary Biology Culver Hall, Rm. 402, 1025 E. 57th St., Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
2 Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605, USA
3 School of Animal and Microbial Sciences University of Reading Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK
4 Sir Harold Mitchell Building, School of Biology, University of St Andrews St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9TH, UK

Edited by Todd Oakley: Associate Editor

{dagger} Corresponding address: Institute for Forest Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, Sieker Landstraße 2, 22927 Großhansdorf, FRG. Phone: ++49 (0) 4102/696–145; Fax: ++49 (0) 4102/696–200; j.buschbom{at}holz.uni-hamburg.de


   Abstract

The evolutionary history of gains and losses of vegetative reproductive propagules (soredia) in Porpidia s.l., a group of lichen-forming ascomycetes, was clarified using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches to monophyly tests and a combined MCMC and maximum likelihood approach to ancestral character state reconstructions. The MCMC framework provided confidence estimates for the reconstructions of relationships and ancestral character states, which formed the basis for tests of evolutionary hypotheses. Monophyly tests rejected all hypotheses that predicted any clustering of reproductive modes in extant taxa. In addition, a nearest-neighbor statistic could not reject the hypothesis that the vegetative reproductive mode is randomly distributed throughout the group. These results show that transitions between presence and absence of the vegetative reproductive mode within Porpidia s.l. occurred several times and independently of each other. Likelihood reconstructions of ancestral character states at selected nodes suggest that—contrary to previous thought—the ancestor to Porpidia s.l. already possessed the vegetative reproductive mode. Furthermore, transition rates are reconstructed asymmetrically with the vegetative reproductive mode being gained at a much lower rate than it is lost. A cautious note has to be added, because a simulation study showed that the ancestral character state reconstructions were highly dependent on taxon sampling. However, our central conclusions, particularly the higher rate of change from vegetative reproductive mode present to absent than vice versa within Porpidia s.l., were found to be broadly independent of taxon sampling.

Keywords: Ancestral character state reconstructions; Ascomycota, Bayesian inference; hypothesis testing; likelihood; MCMC; Porpidia; reproductive systems

Received November 14, 2004; Revised March 3, 2005; Accepted January 10, 2006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. Q. Spinks and H. B. Shaffer
Conflicting Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies for the Widely Disjunct Emys (Testudines: Emydidae) Species Complex, and What They Tell Us about Biogeography and Hybridization
Syst Biol, May 28, 2009; (2009) syp005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. R. Linnen and B. D. Farrell
Comparison of Methods for Species-Tree Inference in the Sawfly Genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 876 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. A. McGuire, C. C. Witt, D. L. Altshuler, and J. V. Remsen
Phylogenetic Systematics and Biogeography of Hummingbirds: Bayesian and Maximum Likelihood Analyses of Partitioned Data and Selection of an Appropriate Partitioning Strategy
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 837 - 856.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.