Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(3):411-425; doi:10.1080/10635150600697283
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Simon, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Differentiating between Hypotheses of Lineage Sorting and Introgression in New Zealand Alpine Cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale)

Thomas R. Buckley1, Michael Cordeiro2, David C. Marshall2 and Chris Simon2

1 Landcare Research Private Bag 92170, Auckland New Zealand buckleyt{at}landcareresearch.co.nz
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut 06269–3043 USA michael.cordeiro{at}huskymail.uconn.edu (M.C.); david.marshall{at}uconn.edu (D.C.M.); csimon{at}uconn.edu (C.S.)

Edited by Tim Collins: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Lineage sorting and introgression can lead to incongruence among gene phylogenies, complicating the inference of species trees for large groups of taxa that have recently and rapidly radiated. In addition, it can be difficult to determine which of these processes is responsible for this incongruence. We explore these issues with the radiation of New Zealand alpine cicadas of the genus Maoricicada Dugdale. Gene trees were estimated from four putative independent loci: mitochondrial DNA (2274 nucleotides), elongation factor 1-{alpha} (1275 nucleotides), period (1709 nucleotides), and calmodulin (678 nucleotides). We reconstructed phylogenies using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods from 44 individuals representing the 19 species and subspecies of Maoricicada and two outgroups. Species-level relationships were reconstructed using a novel extension of gene tree parsimony, whereby gene trees were weighted by their Bayesian posterior probabilities. The inferred gene trees show marked incongruence in the placement of some taxa, especially the enigmatic forest and scrub dwelling species, M. iolanthe. Using the species tree estimated by gene tree parsimony, we simulated coalescent gene trees in order to test the null hypothesis that the nonrandom placement of M. iolanthe among gene trees has arisen by chance. Under the assumptions of constant population size, known generation time, and panmixia, we were able to reject this null hypothesis. Furthermore, because the two alternative placements of M. iolanthe are in each case with species that share a similar song structure, we conclude that it is more likely that an ancient introgression event rather than lineage sorting has caused this incongruence.

Keywords: Cicada; combined data; hybridization; introgression, lineage sorting; reconciled trees

Received May 11, 2005; Revised August 8, 2005; Accepted November 26, 2005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. W. Bloomquist and M. A. Suchard
Unifying Vertical and Nonvertical Evolution: A Stochastic ARG-based Framework
Syst Biol, November 9, 2009; (2009) syp076v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. E. McCormack, H. Huang, and L. L. Knowles
Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Species Trees: How Accuracy of Phylogenetic Inference Depends upon the Divergence History and Sampling Design
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 501 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. S. Kubatko
Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 478 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. Q. Spinks and H. B. Shaffer
Conflicting Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies for the Widely Disjunct Emys (Testudines: Emydidae) Species Complex, and What They Tell Us about Biogeography and Hybridization
Syst Biol, May 28, 2009; (2009) syp005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
S. Joly and A. Bruneau
Measuring Branch Support in Species Trees Obtained by Gene Tree Parsimony
Syst Biol, May 25, 2009; (2009) syp013v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. M. Bossu and T. J. Near
Gene Trees Reveal Repeated Instances of Mitochondrial DNA Introgression in Orangethroat Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma)
Syst Biol, May 22, 2009; (2009) syp014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. T. Brumfield, L. Liu, D. E. Lum, and S. V. Edwards
Comparison of Species Tree Methods for Reconstructing the Phylogeny of Bearded Manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from Multilocus Sequence Data
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 719 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
I. J. Maureira-Butler, B. E. Pfeil, A. Muangprom, T. C. Osborn, and J. J. Doyle
The Reticulate History of Medicago (Fabaceae)
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 466 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. C. Carstens and L. L. Knowles
Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 400 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. Liu and D. K. Pearl
Species Trees from Gene Trees: Reconstructing Bayesian Posterior Distributions of a Species Phylogeny Using Estimated Gene Tree Distributions
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 504 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.