Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(2):345-350; doi:10.1080/10635150500481556
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Discriminating Supported and Unsupported Relationships in Supertrees Using Triplets

Edited by Mike Steel: Associate Editor

James A. Cotton1, Claire S. C. Slater1,2 and Mark Wilkinson1

1 Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK; E-mail: james.cotton@nhm.ac.uk (J.A.C.)
2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EQ, UK

Received June 13, 2005; Revised August 9, 2005; Accepted September 28, 2005
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A supertree is a phylogeny formed by combining information from disparate phylogenetic trees. Supertree methods have been particularly used for constructing large phylogenies from previously published trees and there is a growing literature using supertree methods for phylogenetic inference in macroevolutionary studies (e.g., Davies et al., 2004; Grotkopp et al., 2004; Salamin and Davies, 2004). This empirical supertree work has mostly used matrix representation with parsimony (standard MRP; (standard MRP; Baum, 1992; Ragan, 1992) in which optimal supertrees are found by parsimony analysis of a matrix encoding the full splits of the input trees. A major concern with standard MRP (and some other) supertrees is that they can display relationships that seem to lack evidential support from the input trees, either individually or jointly (Bininda-Emonds and Bryant, 1998; Pisani and Wilkinson, 2002; Wilkinson et al., 2004b). This has prompted the development . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Triplet Support
 

    A Closure Operation and Combined Support
 

    Measures of Triplet Support
 

    Inferring Triplet Supertrees
 

    The Meaning of "Supported" Relationships
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
V. Ranwez, V. Berry, A. Criscuolo, P.-H. Fabre, S. Guillemot, C. Scornavacca, and E. J. P. Douzery
PhySIC: A Veto Supertree Method with Desirable Properties
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 798 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. A. Cotton and M. Wilkinson
Majority-Rule Supertrees
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. R. Moore, S. A. Smith, and M. J. Donoghue
Increasing Data Transparency and Estimating Phylogenetic Uncertainty in Supertrees: Approaches Using Nonparametric Bootstrapping
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 662 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]