Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(2):329-344; doi:10.1080/10635150500541607
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasabe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sota, T.
Right arrow Articles by Sasabe, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Utility of Nuclear Allele Networks for the Analysis of Closely Related Species in the Genus Carabus, Subgenus Ohomopterus

Teiji Sota and Masataka Sasabe

Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University Sakyo, Kyoto 606–8502, Japan E-mail:sota{at}terra.zool.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Edited by Marshal Hedin: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Nuclear DNA sequence data for diploid organisms are potentially a rich source of phylogenetic information for disentangling the evolutionary relationships of closely related organisms, but present special phylogenetic problems owing to difficulties arising from heterozygosity and recombination. We analyzed allelic relationships for two nuclear gene regions (phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and elongation factor-1{alpha}), along with a mitochondrial gene region (NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5), for an assemblage of closely related species of carabid beetles (Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus). We used a network approach to examine whether the nuclear gene sequences provide substantial phylogenetic information on species relationships and evolutionary history. The mitochondrial gene genealogy strongly contradicted the morphological species boundary as a result of introgression of heterospecific mitochondria. Two nuclear gene regions showed high allelic diversity within species, and this diversity was partially attributable to recombination between various alleles and high variability in the intron region. Shared nuclear alleles among species were rare and were considered to represent shared ancestral polymorphism. Despite the presence of recombination, nuclear allelic networks recovered species monophyly more often and presented genetic differentiation patterns (low to high) among species more clearly. Overall, nuclear gene networks provide clear evidence for separate biological species and information on the phylogenetic relationships among closely related carabid beetles.

Keywords: Gene genealogy; introgression; mitochondrial DNA; nuclear DNA; phylogeny; recombination; species relationship

Received June 18, 2005; Revised August 12, 2005; Accepted October 25, 2005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
T. Sota and N. Nagata
Diversification in a fluctuating island setting: rapid radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles in the Japanese Islands
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 27, 2008; 363(1508): 3377 - 3390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. A. Morrison
Increasing the Efficiency of Searches for the Maximum Likelihood Tree in a Phylogenetic Analysis of up to 150 Nucleotide Sequences
Syst Biol, December 1, 2007; 56(6): 988 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.