© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists
Inferring Phylogeny Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting
1 Departments of Zoology and Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4; E-mail: wmaddisn{at}interchange.ubc.ca
2 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109–1079, USA; E-mail: knowlesl{at}umich.edu
Edited by Tim Collins: Associate Editor
| Abstract |
|---|
It is now well known that incomplete lineage sorting can cause serious difficulties for phylogenetic inference, but little attention has been paid to methods that attempt to overcome these difficulties by explicitly considering the processes that produce them. Here we explore approaches to phylogenetic inference designed to consider retention and sorting of ancestral polymorphism. We examine how the reconstructability of a species (or population) phylogeny is affected by (a) the number of loci used to estimate the phylogeny and (b) the number of individuals sampled per species. Even in difficult cases with considerable incomplete lineage sorting (times between divergences less than 1 Ne generations), we found the reconstructed species trees matched the "true" species trees in at least three out of five partitions, as long as a reasonable number of individuals per species were sampled. We also studied the tradeoff between sampling more loci versus more individuals. Although increasing the number of loci gives more accurate trees for a given sampling effort with deeper species trees (e.g., total depth of 10 Ne generations), sampling more individuals often gives better results than sampling more loci with shallower species trees (e.g., depth = 1 Ne). Taken together, these results demonstrate that gene sequences retain enough signal to achieve an accurate estimate of phylogeny despite widespread incomplete lineage sorting. Continued improvement in our methods to reconstruct phylogeny near the species level will require a shift to a compound model that considers not only nucleotide or character state substitutions, but also the population genetics processes of lineage sorting.
Keywords: Coalescence; divergence; population; speciation
Received October 25, 2004; Revised January 21, 2005; Accepted May 25, 2005
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. D. Leache Species Tree Discordance Traces to Phylogeographic Clade Boundaries in North American Fence Lizards (Sceloporus) Syst Biol, December 1, 2009; 58(6): 547 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Fulton and C. Strobeck Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line Proc R Soc B, November 25, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1783v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. O'Meara New Heuristic Methods for Joint Species Delimitation and Species Tree Inference Syst Biol, November 10, 2009; (2009) syp077v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Walters, P. Grant, and D. L. E. Johnson Evolution of the GST Omega Gene Family in 12 Drosophila Species J. Hered., November 1, 2009; 100(6): 742 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu, L. Yu, D. K. Pearl, and S. V. Edwards Estimating Species Phylogenies Using Coalescence Times among Sequences Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 468 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. McCormack, H. Huang, and L. L. Knowles Maximum Likelihood Estimates of Species Trees: How Accuracy of Phylogenetic Inference Depends upon the Divergence History and Sampling Design Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Huang and L. L. Knowles What Is the Danger of the Anomaly Zone for Empirical Phylogenetics? Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Kubatko Identifying Hybridization Events in the Presence of Coalescence via Model Selection Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 478 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Knowles Estimating Species Trees: Methods of Phylogenetic Analysis When There Is Incongruence across Genes Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 463 - 467. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Cranston, B. Hurwitz, D. Ware, L. Stein, and R. A. Wing Species Trees from Highly Incongruent Gene Trees in Rice Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 489 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Savage and S. P. Mullen A single origin of Batesian mimicry among hybridizing populations of admiral butterflies (Limenitis arthemis) rejects an evolutionary reversion to the ancestral phenotype Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2557 - 2565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Frajman, F. Eggens, and B. Oxelman Hybrid Origins and Homoploid Reticulate Evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae)--A Multigene Phylogenetic Approach with Relative Dating Syst Biol, July 3, 2009; (2009) syp030v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Degnan, M. DeGiorgio, D. Bryant, and N. A. Rosenberg Properties of Consensus Methods for Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees Syst Biol, June 4, 2009; (2009) syp008v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Joly and A. Bruneau Measuring Branch Support in Species Trees Obtained by Gene Tree Parsimony Syst Biol, May 25, 2009; (2009) syp013v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Bossu and T. J. Near Gene Trees Reveal Repeated Instances of Mitochondrial DNA Introgression in Orangethroat Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma) Syst Biol, May 22, 2009; (2009) syp014v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Akerborg, B. Sennblad, L. Arvestad, and J. Lagergren Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis PNAS, April 7, 2009; 106(14): 5714 - 5719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Mouly, S. G. Razafimandimbison, A. Khodabandeh, and B. Bremer Phylogeny and classification of the species-rich pantropical showy genus Ixora (Rubiaceae-Ixoreae) with indications of geographical monophyletic units and hybrids Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2009; 96(3): 686 - 706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Linnen and B. D. Farrell Comparison of Methods for Species-Tree Inference in the Sawfly Genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 876 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Brumfield, L. Liu, D. E. Lum, and S. V. Edwards Comparison of Species Tree Methods for Reconstructing the Phylogeny of Bearded Manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from Multilocus Sequence Data Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 719 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-W. Yuan and R. G. Olmstead Evolution and phylogenetic utility of the PHOT gene duplicates in the Verbena complex (Verbenaceae): dramatic intron size variation and footprint of ancestral recombination Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2008; 95(9): 1166 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Maureira-Butler, B. E. Pfeil, A. Muangprom, T. C. Osborn, and J. J. Doyle The Reticulate History of Medicago (Fabaceae) Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 466 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Avise and T. J. Robinson Hemiplasy: A New Term in the Lexicon of Phylogenetics Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 503 - 507. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L Prudic and J. C Oliver Once a Batesian mimic, not always a Batesian mimic: mimic reverts back to ancestral phenotype when the model is absent Proc R Soc B, May 22, 2008; 275(1639): 1125 - 1132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Belfiore, L. Liu, and C. Moritz Multilocus Phylogenetics of a Rapid Radiation in the Genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae) Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 294 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Knowles and B. C. Carstens Delimiting Species without Monophyletic Gene Trees Syst Biol, December 1, 2007; 56(6): 887 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Shaffer and R. C. Thomson Delimiting Species in Recent Radiations Syst Biol, December 1, 2007; 56(6): 896 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Carstens and L. L. Knowles Estimating Species Phylogeny from Gene-Tree Probabilities Despite Incomplete Lineage Sorting: An Example from Melanoplus Grasshoppers Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 400 - 411. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Liu and D. K. Pearl Species Trees from Gene Trees: Reconstructing Bayesian Posterior Distributions of a Species Phylogeny Using Estimated Gene Tree Distributions Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 504 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Kubatko and J. H. Degnan Inconsistency of Phylogenetic Estimates from Concatenated Data under Coalescence Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 17 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Joly and A. Bruneau Incorporating Allelic Variation for Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Organisms from Multiple Genes: An Example from Rosa in North America Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 623 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




