© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists
An Empirical Assessment of Long-Branch Attraction Artefacts in Deep Eukaryotic Phylogenomics
1 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Centre Robert Cedergren, Département de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Succursale Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec H3C3J7, Canada; E-mail: herve.philippe{at}umontreal.ca (H.P.)
2 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London Mile End Road, E1 4NS, London, UK
Edited by Marshal Hedin
| Abstract |
|---|
In the context of exponential growing molecular databases, it becomes increasingly easy to assemble large multigene data sets for phylogenomic studies. The expected increase of resolution due to the reduction of the sampling (stochastic) error is becoming a reality. However, the impact of systematic biases will also become more apparent or even dominant. We have chosen to study the case of the long-branch attraction artefact (LBA) using real instead of simulated sequences. Two fast-evolving eukaryotic lineages, whose evolutionary positions are well established, microsporidia and the nucleomorph of cryptophytes, were chosen as model species. A large data set was assembled (44 species, 133 genes, and 24,294 amino acid positions) and the resulting rooted eukaryotic phylogeny (using a distant archaeal outgroup) is positively misled by an LBA artefact despite the use of a maximum likelihood–based tree reconstruction method with a complex model of sequence evolution. When the fastest evolving proteins from the fast lineages are progressively removed (up to 90%), the bootstrap support for the apparently artefactual basal placement decreases to virtually 0%, and conversely only the expected placement, among all the possible locations of the fast-evolving species, receives increasing support that eventually converges to 100%. The percentage of removal of the fastest evolving proteins constitutes a reliable estimate of the sensitivity of phylogenetic inference to LBA. This protocol confirms that both a rich species sampling (especially the presence of a species that is closely related to the fast-evolving lineage) and a probabilistic method with a complex model are important to overcome the LBA artefact. Finally, we observed that phylogenetic inference methods perform strikingly better with simulated as opposed to real data, and suggest that testing the reliability of phylogenetic inference methods with simulated data leads to overconfidence in their performance. Although phylogenomic studies can be affected by systematic biases, the possibility of discarding a large amount of data containing most of the nonphylogenetic signal allows recovering a phylogeny that is less affected by systematic biases, while maintaining a high statistical support.
Keywords: Distant outgroup; eukaryotic tree; long-branch attraction; microsporidia; multigene data sets; nucleomorph; rooting; species sampling; systematic biases
Received November 5, 2004; Revised February 7, 2005; Accepted April 30, 2005
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Simon, S. Strauss, A. von Haeseler, and H. Hadrys A Phylogenomic Approach to Resolve the Basal Pterygote Divergence Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2719 - 2730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Caron, P. D. Countway, P. Savai, R. J. Gast, A. Schnetzer, S. D. Moorthi, M. R. Dennett, D. M. Moran, and A. C. Jones Defining DNA-Based Operational Taxonomic Units for Microbial-Eukaryote Ecology Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 15, 2009; 75(18): 5797 - 5808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Archibald and C. E. Lane Going, Going, Not Quite Gone: Nucleomorphs as a Case Study in Nuclear Genome Reduction J. Hered., September 1, 2009; 100(5): 582 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Castoe, A. P. J. de Koning, H.-M. Kim, W. Gu, B. P. Noonan, G. Naylor, Z. J. Jiang, C. L. Parkinson, and D. D. Pollock From the Cover: Evidence for an ancient adaptive episode of convergent molecular evolution PNAS, June 2, 2009; 106(22): 8986 - 8991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Edwards Natural selection and phylogenetic analysis PNAS, June 2, 2009; 106(22): 8799 - 8800. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Inagaki, Y. Nakajima, M. Sato, M. Sakaguchi, and T. Hashimoto Gene Sampling Can Bias Multi-Gene Phylogenetic Inferences: The Relationship between Red Algae and Green Plants as a Case Study Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2009; 26(5): 1171 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Hampl, L. Hug, J. W. Leigh, J. B. Dacks, B. F. Lang, A. G. B. Simpson, and A. J. Roger Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic "supergroups" PNAS, March 10, 2009; 106(10): 3859 - 3864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Si Quang, O. Gascuel, and N. Lartillot Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction Bioinformatics, October 15, 2008; 24(20): 2317 - 2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wahlberg and C. W. Wheat Genomic Outposts Serve the Phylogenomic Pioneers: Designing Novel Nuclear Markers for Genomic DNA Extractions of Lepidoptera Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 231 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Roy and M. Irimia Rare Genomic Characters Do Not Support Coelomata: Intron Loss/Gain Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 620 - 623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Lane, K. van den Heuvel, C. Kozera, B. A. Curtis, B. J. Parsons, S. Bowman, and J. M. Archibald Nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii reveals complete intron loss and compaction as a driver of protein structure and function PNAS, December 11, 2007; 104(50): 19908 - 19913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zheng, I. B. Rogozin, E. V. Koonin, and T. M. Przytycka Support for the Coelomata Clade of Animals from a Rigorous Analysis of the Pattern of Intron Conservation Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2007; 24(11): 2583 - 2592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grauvogel, H. Brinkmann, and J. Petersen Evolution of the Glucose-6-Phosphate Isomerase: The Plasticity of Primary Metabolism in Photosynthetic Eukaryotes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1611 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, H. Brinkmann, B. Roure, N. Lartillot, B. F. Lang, and H. Philippe Detecting and Overcoming Systematic Errors in Genome-Scale Phylogenies Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 389 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Bevan, D. Bryant, and B. F. Lang Accounting for Gene Rate Heterogeneity in Phylogenetic Inference Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 194 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, L. Carmel, and E. V. Koonin Ecdysozoan Clade Rejected by Genome-Wide Analysis of Rare Amino Acid Replacements Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 1080 - 1090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, H. Philippe, H. Brinkmann, B. Becker, and M. Melkonian Phylogenetic Analyses of Nuclear, Mitochondrial, and Plastid Multigene Data Sets Support the Placement of Mesostigma in the Streptophyta Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2007; 24(3): 723 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ruano-Rubio and M. A. Fares Artifactual Phylogenies Caused by Correlated Distribution of Substitution Rates among Sites and Lineages: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 68 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J Roger and L. A Hug The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2006; 361(1470): 1039 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Lartillot and H. Philippe Computing Bayes Factors Using Thermodynamic Integration Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 195 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






