Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(4):660-668; doi:10.1080/10635150590947104
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shonfeld, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shonfeld, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Automated Phylogenetic Taxonomy: An Example in the Homobasidiomycetes (Mushroom-Forming Fungi)

Edited by Vincent Savolainen: Associate Editor

David S. Hibbett1, R. Henrik Nilsson2, Marc Snyder1, Mario Fonseca1, Janine Costanzo1 and Moran Shonfeld1

1 Biology Department, Clark University Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610, USA E-mail: dhibbett@black.clarku.edu (D.S.H.)

Received September 14, 2004; Revised November 2, 2004; Accepted November 19, 2004
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Systematists confront a truly formidable task, which is to construct a comprehensive, phylogenetically accurate classification for all of life. Progress toward this goal has accelerated in recent years through analyses of DNA and protein sequences. The dramatic growth of molecular phylogenetics prompts us to ask whether established taxonomic practices are equipped to deal with the rapidly accumulating data. Here, we consider the current status of phylogenetics and classification in the homobasidiomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi), which includes roughly 17,000 described species (Kirk et al., 2001). We find that the available data are not being integrated, and that there is a significant gap between current taxonomy and understanding of phylogenetic relationships. To close this gap, we suggest that there is a need for new approaches that use the tools of bioinformatics to automate the process of phylogenetic analysis and classification, and we describe a prototype software package that we have developed . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Current Status of Homobasidiomycete Systematics
 
Progress in Phylogenetic Reconstruction
Progress in Classification

    Toward an Automated Phylogenetic Taxonomy of Homobasidiomycetes
 
Automated Phylogenetic Reconstruction
Automated Phylogenetic Taxonomy

    Conclusions and Future Directions
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. D. M. Page and J. Sullivan
The Expanding Contributions of Systematic Biology
Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. D. Cantino and R. G. Olmstead
Application of Phylogenetically Defined Names Does Not Require That Every Specifier Be Present on a Tree
Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 157 - 160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
M. P. Nelsen, R. Lucking, L. Umana, M. T. Trest, S. Will-Wolf, J. L. Chaves, and A. Gargas
Multiclavula ichthyiformis (Fungi: Basidiomycota: Cantharellales: Clavulinaceae), a remarkable new basidiolichen from Costa Rica
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2007; 94(8): 1289 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. A. Goloboff and D. Pol
On Divide-and-Conquer Strategies for Parsimony Analysis of Large Data Sets: Rec-I-DCM3 versus TNT
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 485 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
D. S. Hibbett
A phylogenetic overview of the Agaricomycotina
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 917 - 925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
J.-M. Moncalvo, R. H. Nilsson, B. Koster, S. M. Dunham, T. Bernauer, P. B. Matheny, T. M. Porter, S. Margaritescu, M. Weiss, S. Garnica, et al.
The cantharelloid clade: dealing with incongruent gene trees and phylogenetic reconstruction methods
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 937 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. M. McMahon and M. J. Sanderson
Phylogenetic Supermatrix Analysis of GenBank Sequences from 2228 Papilionoid Legumes
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 818 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
Y. Bertrand and M. Harlin
Stability and Universality in the Application of Taxon Names in Phylogenetic Nomenclature
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 848 - 858.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
E. A. Kellogg
Progress and challenges in studies of the evolution of development
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2006; 57(13): 3505 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
T. G. Lilburn, S. H. Harrison, J. R. Cole, and G. M. Garrity
Computational aspects of systematic biology
Brief Bioinform, June 1, 2006; 7(2): 186 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M. J. Sanderson
Paloverde: an OpenGL 3D phylogeny browser
Bioinformatics, April 15, 2006; 22(8): 1004 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
V. Berry and C. Semple
Fast Computation of Supertrees for Compatible Phylogenies with Nested Taxa
Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 270 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]