Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(3):483-492; doi:10.1080/10635150590945368
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gatesy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gatesy, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Hidden Likelihood Support in Genomic Data: Can Forty-Five Wrongs Make a Right?

John Gatesy1 and Richard H. Baker2

1 Department of Biology, University of California—Riverside Riverside, California, 92521, USA E-mail: john.gatesy{at}ucr.edu
2 Evolutionary Genomics Department, DOE Joint Genome Institute 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, California, 94598, USA

Edited by Thomas Buckley: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Combined analysis of multiple phylogenetic data sets can reveal emergent character support that is not evident in separate analyses of individual data sets. Previous parsimony analyses have shown that this hidden support often accounts for a large percentage of the overall phylogenetic signal in cladistic studies. Here, reanalysis of a large comparative genomic data set for yeast (genus Saccharomyces) demonstrates that hidden support can be an important factor in maximum likelihood analyses of multiple data sets as well. Emergent signal in a concatenation of 106 genes was responsible for up to 64% of the likelihood support at a particular node (the difference in log likelihood scores between optimal topologies that included and excluded a supported clade). A grouping of four yeast species (S. cerevisiae, S. paradoxus, S. mikatae, and S. kudriavzevii) was robustly supported by combined analysis of all 106 genes, but separate analyses of individual genes suggested numerous conflicts. Forty-eight genes strictly contradicted S. cerevisiae + S. paradoxus + S. mikatae + S. kudriavzevii in separate analyses, but combined likelihood analyses that included up to 45 of the "wrong" data sets supported this group. Extensive hidden support also emerged in a combined likelihood analysis of 41 genes that each recovered the exact same topology in separate analyses of the individual genes. These results show that isolated analyses of individual data sets can mask congruence and distort interpretations of clade stability, even in strictly model-based phylogenetic methods. Consensus and supertree procedures that ignore hidden phylogenetic signals are, at best, incomplete.

Keywords: Character partitions; combined analysis; hidden support; maximum likelihood; phylogenomics; yeast

Received March 17, 2004; Revised June 22, 2004; Accepted October 7, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. L. Fulton and C. Strobeck
Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line
Proc R Soc B, November 25, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1783v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Wurdack and C. C. Davis
Malpighiales phylogenetics: Gaining ground on one of the most recalcitrant clades in the angiosperm tree of life
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1551 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. R. Linnen and B. D. Farrell
Comparison of Methods for Species-Tree Inference in the Sawfly Genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae)
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 876 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C.-H. Kuo, J. P. Wares, and J. C. Kissinger
The Apicomplexan Whole-Genome Phylogeny: An Analysis of Incongruence among Gene Trees
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2008; 25(12): 2689 - 2698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. J. Wiens, C. A. Kuczynski, S. A. Smith, D. G. Mulcahy, J. W. Sites Jr., T. M. Townsend, and T. W. Reeder
Branch Lengths, Support, and Congruence: Testing the Phylogenomic Approach with 20 Nuclear Loci in Snakes
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 420 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
N. M. Belfiore, L. Liu, and C. Moritz
Multilocus Phylogenetics of a Rapid Radiation in the Genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae)
Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 294 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. J. Asher, J. H. Geisler, and M. R. Sanchez-Villagra
Morphology, Paleontology, and Placental Mammal Phylogeny
Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 311 - 317.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. Benavides, R. Baum, D. McClellan, and J. W. Sites
Molecular Phylogenetics of the Lizard Genus Microlophus (Squamata:Tropiduridae): Aligning and Retrieving Indel Signal from Nuclear Introns
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 776 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. V. Edwards, L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl
High-resolution species trees without concatenation
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5936 - 5941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Gatesy, R. DeSalle, and N. Wahlberg
How Many Genes Should a Systematist Sample? Conflicting Insights from a Phylogenomic Matrix Characterized by Replicated Incongruence
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 355 - 363.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
I. Comas, A. Moya, and F. Gonzalez-Candelas
From Phylogenetics to Phylogenomics: The Evolutionary Relationships of Insect Endosymbiotic {gamma}-Proteobacteria as a Test Case
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Ane, B. Larget, D. A. Baum, S. D. Smith, and A. Rokas
Bayesian Estimation of Concordance among Gene Trees
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 412 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. G. Burleigh, A. C. Driskell, and M. J. Sanderson
Supertree Bootstrapping Methods for Assessing Phylogenetic Variation among Genes in Genome-Scale Data Sets
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 426 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.