Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(3):455-470; doi:10.1080/10635150590945313
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (49)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rannala, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Rannala, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Branch-Length Prior Influences Bayesian Posterior Probability of Phylogeny

Ziheng Yang1 and Bruce Rannala2

1 Department of Biology, University College London Darwin Building, Gower Street London WC1E 6BT United Kingdom E-mail: z.yang{at}ucl.ac.uk
2 Genome Center and Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A

Edited by Paul Lewis: Associate Editor


   Abstract

The Bayesian method for estimating species phylogenies from molecular sequence data provides an attractive alternative to maximum likelihood with nonparametric bootstrap due to the easy interpretation of posterior probabilities for trees and to availability of efficient computational algorithms. However, for many data sets it produces extremely high posterior probabilities, sometimes for apparently incorrect clades. Here we use both computer simulation and empirical data analysis to examine the effect of the prior model for internal branch lengths. We found that posterior probabilities for trees and clades are sensitive to the prior for internal branch lengths, and priors assuming long internal branches cause high posterior probabilities for trees. In particular, uniform priors with high upper bounds bias Bayesian clade probabilities in favor of extreme values. We discuss possible remedies to the problem, including empirical and full Bayesian methods and subjective procedures suggested in Bayesian hypothesis testing. Our results also suggest that the bootstrap proportion and Bayesian posterior probability are different measures of accuracy, and that the bootstrap proportion, if interpreted as the probability that the clade is true, can be either too liberal or too conservative.

Keywords: Fair-balance paradox; Lindley's paradox; model selection; molecular phylogenetics; posterior probabilities; prior; star tree paradox

Received May 17, 2004; Revised October 2, 2004; Accepted January 21, 2005
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. C. Marshall
Cryptic Failure of Partitioned Bayesian Phylogenetic Analyses: Lost in the Land of Long Trees
Syst Biol, November 17, 2009; (2009) syp080v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L.-J. Liang, R. E. Weiss, B. Redelings, and M. A. Suchard
Improving phylogenetic analyses by incorporating additional information from genetic sequence databases
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2009; 25(19): 2530 - 2536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. Liu and S. V. Edwards
Phylogenetic Analysis in the Anomaly Zone
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 452 - 460.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
P. Q. Spinks and H. B. Shaffer
Conflicting Mitochondrial and Nuclear Phylogenies for the Widely Disjunct Emys (Testudines: Emydidae) Species Complex, and What They Tell Us about Biogeography and Hybridization
Syst Biol, May 28, 2009; (2009) syp005v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. R. Lemmon, J. M. Brown, K. Stanger-Hall, and E. M. Lemmon
The Effect of Ambiguous Data on Phylogenetic Estimates Obtained by Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference
Syst Biol, May 22, 2009; (2009) syp017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
Z. Yang
Empirical evaluation of a prior for Bayesian phylogenetic inference
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 27, 2008; 363(1512): 4031 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. C. Regier, J. W. Shultz, A. R. D. Ganley, A. Hussey, D. Shi, B. Ball, A. Zwick, J. E. Stajich, M. P. Cummings, J. W. Martin, et al.
Resolving Arthropod Phylogeny: Exploring Phylogenetic Signal within 41 kb of Protein-Coding Nuclear Gene Sequence
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 920 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Kim and M. J. Sanderson
Penalized Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference: Bridging the Parsimony-Likelihood Gap
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 665 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
G. Baele, Y. Van de Peer, and S. Vansteelandt
A Model-Based Approach to Study Nearest-Neighbor Influences Reveals Complex Substitution Patterns in Non-coding Sequences
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 675 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Dohrmann, D. Janussen, J. Reitner, A. G. Collins, and G. Worheide
Phylogeny and Evolution of Glass Sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida)
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 388 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. Britton, C. L. Anderson, D. Jacquet, S. Lundqvist, and K. Bremer
Estimating Divergence Times in Large Phylogenetic Trees
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 741 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
D. A. Henk and R. Vilgalys
Molecular phylogeny suggests a single origin of insect symbiosis in the Pucciniomycetes with support for some relationships within the genus Septobasidium
Am. J. Botany, September 1, 2007; 94(9): 1515 - 1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Kolaczkowski and J. W. Thornton
Effects of Branch Length Uncertainty on Bayesian Posterior Probabilities for Phylogenetic Hypotheses
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2108 - 2118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Yang
Fair-Balance Paradox, Star-tree Paradox, and Bayesian Phylogenetics
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1639 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol LettHome page
K. L Sanders and M. S.Y Lee
Evaluating molecular clock calibrations using Bayesian analyses with soft and hard bounds
Biol Lett, June 22, 2007; 3(3): 275 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. V. Edwards, L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl
High-resolution species trees without concatenation
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5936 - 5941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Steel and F. A. Matsen
The Bayesian "Star Paradox" Persists for Long Finite Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Anisimova and O. Gascuel
Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 539 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Muller and R. R. Reisz
The Phylogeny of Early Eureptiles: Comparing Parsimony and Bayesian Approaches in the Investigation of a Basal Fossil Clade
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 503 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. P. Randle and K. M. Pickett
Are Nonuniform Clade Priors Important in Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis? A Response to Brandley et al.
Syst Biol, February 1, 2006; 55(1): 147 - 151.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.