| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists
Molecular Phylogeny of the Carnivora (Mammalia): Assessing the Impact of Increased Sampling on Resolving Enigmatic Relationships
1 Department of Geology, The Field Museum 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA E-mail: jflynn{at}amnh.org (J.J.F.)
2 Committee on Evolutionary Biology, The University of Chicago 1025 E. 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA
3 Biological Sciences Collegiate Division, The University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois, 60637, USA
Edited by Olaf Bininda-Emonds: Associate Editor
 |
Abstract |
|---|
This study analyzed 76 species of Carnivora using a concatenated sequence of 6243 bp from six genes (nuclear TR-i-I, TBG, and IRBP; mitochondrial ND2, CYTB, and 12S rRNA), representing the most comprehensive sampling yet undertaken for reconstructing the phylogeny of this clade. Maximum parsimony and Bayesian methods were remarkably congruent in topologies observed and in nodal support measures. We recovered all of the higher level carnivoran clades that had been robustly supported in previous analyses (by analyses of morphological and molecular data), including the monophyly of Caniformia, Feliformia, Arctoidea, Pinnipedia, Musteloidea, Procyonidae + Mustelidae sensu stricto, and a clade of (Hyaenidae + (Herpestidae + Malagasy carnivorans)). All of the traditional "families," with the exception of Viverridae and Mustelidae, were robustly supported as monophyletic groups. We further have determined the relative positions of the major lineages within the Caniformia, which previous studies could not resolve, including the first robust support for the phylogenetic position of marine carnivorans (Pinnipedia) within the Arctoidea (as the sister-group to musteloids [sensu lato], with ursids as their sister group). Within the pinnipeds, Odobenidae (walrus) was more closely allied with otariids (sea lions/fur seals) than with phocids ("true" seals). In addition, we recovered a monophyletic clade of skunks and stink badgers (Mephitidae) and resolved the topology of musteloid interrelationships as: Ailurus (Mephitidae (Procyonidae, Mustelidae [sensu stricto])). This pattern of interrelationships of living caniforms suggests a novel inference that large body size may have been the primitive condition for Arctoidea, with secondary size reduction evolving later in some musteloids. Within Mustelidae, Bayesian analyses are unambiguous in supporting otter monophyly (Lutrinae), and in both MP and Bayesian analyses Martes is paraphyletic with respect to Gulo and Eira, as has been observed in some previous molecular studies. Within Feliformia, we have confirmed that Nandinia is the outgroup to all other extant feliforms, and that the Malagasy Carnivora are a monophyletic clade closely allied with the mongooses (Herpestidae [sensu stricto]). Although the monophyly of each of the three major feliform clades (Viverridae sensu stricto, Felidae, and the clade of Hyaenidae + (Herpestidae + Malagasy carnivorans)) is robust in all of our analyses, the relative phylogenetic positions of these three lineages is not resolvable at present. Our analyses document the monophyly of the "social mongooses," strengthening evidence for a single origin of eusociality within the Herpestidae. For a single caniform node, the position of pinnipeds relative to Ursidae and Musteloidea, parsimony analyses of data for the entire Carnivora did not replicate the robust support observed for both parsimony and Bayesian analyses of the caniform ingroup alone. More detailed analyses and these results demonstrate that outgroup choice can have a considerable effect on the strength of support for a particular topology. Therefore, the use of exemplar taxa as proxies for entire clades with diverse evolutionary histories should be approached with caution.The Bayesian analysis likelihood functions generally were better able to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships (increased resolution and more robust support for various nodes) than parsimony analyses when incompletely sampled taxa were included. Bayesian analyses were not immune, however, to the effects of missing data; lower resolution and support in those analyses likely arise from non-overlap of gene sequence data among less well-sampled taxa. These issues are a concern for similar studies, in which different gene sequences are concatenated in an effort to increase resolving power.
Keywords: Bayesian; Carnivora; parsimony; phylogeny; resolution; sampling
Received March 3, 2004; Revised May 7, 2004; Accepted August 4, 2004
4 Current Address: Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, 10024, USA
5 Current Address: P.O. Box 637, Maple Valley, Washington, 98038, USA
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  V. Campbell and F.-J. Lapointe The Use and Validity of Composite Taxa in Phylogenetic Analysis Syst Biol, December 1, 2009; 58(6): 560 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Pirie, A. M. Humphreys, N. P. Barker, and H. P. Linder Reticulation, Data Combination, and Inferring Evolutionary History: An Example from Danthonioideae (Poaceae) Syst Biol, December 1, 2009; 58(6): 612 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. L. Fulton and C. Strobeck Multiple markers and multiple individuals refine true seal phylogeny and bring molecules and morphology back in line Proc R Soc B, November 25, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1783v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Li, D. Glaser, W. Li, W. E. Johnson, S. J. O'Brien, G. K. Beauchamp, and J. G. Brand Analyses of Sweet Receptor Gene (Tas1r2) and Preference for Sweet Stimuli in Species of Carnivora J. Hered., July 1, 2009; 100(suppl_1): S90 - S100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Finarelli and J. J. Flynn Brain-size evolution and sociality in Carnivora PNAS, June 9, 2009; 106(23): 9345 - 9349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. E. Olson and D. T. Blumstein A trait-based approach to understand the evolution of complex coalitions in male mammals Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 624 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Finarelli Hierarchy and the reconstruction of evolutionary trends: evidence for constraints on the evolution of body size in terrestrial caniform carnivorans (Mammalia) Paleobiology, December 1, 2008; 34(4): 553 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. G. Nash, J. C. Menninger, H. M. Padilla-Nash, G. Stone, P. L. Perelman, and S. J. O'Brien The Ancestral Carnivore Karyotype (2n = 38) Lives Today in Ringtails J. Hered., May 1, 2008; 99(3): 241 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Van Valkenburgh Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 147 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Benton and P. C. J. Donoghue Paleontological Evidence to Date the Tree of Life Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 26 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Yu and Y.-p. Zhang The Unusual Adaptive Expansion of Pancreatic Ribonuclease Gene in Carnivora Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2326 - 2335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Asher and M. Hofreiter Tenrec Phylogeny and the Noninvasive Extraction of Nuclear DNA Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 181 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Finarelli and J. J. Flynn Ancestral State Reconstruction of Body Size in the Caniformia (Carnivora, Mammalia): The Effects of Incorporating Data from the Fossil Record Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 301 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Salesa, M. Anton, S. Peigne, and J. Morales Evidence of a false thumb in a fossil carnivore clarifies the evolution of pandas PNAS, January 10, 2006; 103(2): 379 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|