Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(2):299-316; doi:10.1080/10635150590923317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Linder, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hardy, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Linder, H. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Intraspecific Variability and Timing in Ancestral Ecology Reconstruction: A Test Case from the Cape Flora

Christopher R. Hardy1,2 and H. Peter Linder1

1 Institute of Systematic Botany Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland E-mail: chardy{at}systbot.unizh.ch (C.R.H.)

Edited by Todd Oakley: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Thamnochortus (ca. 32 species) is an ecologically diverse genus of Restionaceae. Restionaceae comprise a major component of the southern African Cape flora, wherein eco-diversification might have been important in the generation of high levels of species richness. In an attempt to reconstruct the macroecological history of Thamnochortus, it was found that standard procedures for character state optimization make two inappropriate assumptions. The first is that ancestors are monomorphic (i.e., ecologically uniform) and the second is that eco-diversification follows, or is slower than, lineage diversification. We demonstrate a variety of coding schemes with which the assumption of monomorphy can be avoided. For unordered discrete ecological characters, presence coding and generalized frequency coding (GFC) are suboptimal because they occasionally yield illogical assignments of no state to ancestors. Polymorphism coding or use of the program DIVA are preferable in this respect but are applicable only with parsimony. For continuous eco-characters (e.g., a rainfall gradient, where individual species occur in ranges), GFC and MaxMin coding provide equally valid solutions to optimizing ranges with parsimony. However, MaxMin can be extended to likelihood approaches and is therefore preferable. With respect to rates and timing, all algorithms currently employed for ancestral ecology reconstruction bias toward slow rates of eco-diversification relative to lineage diversification. An alternative to this bias is provided by DIVA, which biases toward accelerated rates of eco-diversification and thus inferences of ecology-driven speciation. We see no way of choosing between these biases; however, phylogeneticists should be aware of them. Applying these methods to Thamnochortus, we find there to be important differences in details, yet general congruence, regarding the historical ecology of this clade. We infer the most recent common ancestor of Thamnochortus to have been a post-fire resprouting species distributed on rocky, well-drained, sandstone-derived soils at lower-middle elevations, in regions of moderate levels of yearly (primarily winter) rainfall. This species would have been distributed in habitats much like those of the southwestern Cape mountains today. Major ecological trends include shifts to lower rainfall regimes and shifts from sandstone to limestone-derived alkaline soils at lower altitudes.

Keywords: Ancestor reconstruction; Cape flora; evolutionary ecology; generalized frequency coding; macroecology; optimization; Restionaceae; Thamnochortus

Received February 6, 2004; Revised June 20, 2004; Accepted August 24, 2004


2 Current Address: Biology Department and Herbarium, Millersville University, Millersville PA, 17551, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. R. Clark, R. H. Ree, M. E. Alfaro, M. G. King, W. L. Wagner, and E. H. Roalson
A Comparative Study in Ancestral Range Reconstruction Methods: Retracing the Uncertain Histories of Insular Lineages
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 693 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
C. Galley, B. Bytebier, D. U Bellstedt, and H Peter Linder
The Cape element in the Afrotemperate flora: from Cape to Cairo?
Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2007; 274(1609): 535 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. Yesson and A. Culham
Phyloclimatic Modeling: Combining Phylogenetics and Bioclimatic Modeling
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 785 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. P. Linder, T. Dlamini, J. Henning, and G. A. Verboom
The evolutionary history of Melianthus (Melianthaceae)
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2006; 93(7): 1052 - 1064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.