Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(2):241-253; doi:10.1080/10635150590924208
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (87)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Holsinger, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, P. O.
Right arrow Articles by Holsinger, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Polytomies and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference

Paul O. Lewis1, Mark T. Holder2 and Kent E. Holsinger1

1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut 75 N. Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, Connecticut 06269–3043, USA E-mail: paul.lewis{at}uconn.edu (P.O.L.)
2 School of Computational Science and Information Technology (CSIT), 150-F Dirac Science Library, Florida State University Tallahassee, Florida 32306–4120, USA

Edited by Thomas Buckley: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Bayesian phylogenetic analyses are now very popular in systematics and molecular evolution because they allow the use of much more realistic models than currently possible with maximum likelihood methods. There are, however, a growing number of examples in which large Bayesian posterior clade probabilities are associated with very short branch lengths and low values for non-Bayesian measures of support such as nonparametric bootstrapping. For the four-taxon case when the true tree is the star phylogeny, Bayesian analyses become increasingly unpredictable in their preference for one of the three possible resolved tree topologies as data set size increases. This leads to the prediction that hard (or near-hard) polytomies in nature will cause unpredictable behavior in Bayesian analyses, with arbitrary resolutions of the polytomy receiving very high posterior probabilities in some cases. We present a simple solution to this problem involving a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that allows exploration of all of tree space, including unresolved tree topologies with one or more polytomies. The reversible-jump MCMC approach allows prior distributions to place some weight on less-resolved tree topologies, which eliminates misleadingly high posteriors associated with arbitrary resolutions of hard polytomies. Fortunately, assigning some prior probability to polytomous tree topologies does not appear to come with a significant cost in terms of the ability to assess the level of support for edges that do exist in the true tree. Methods are discussed for applying arbitrary prior distributions to tree topologies of varying resolution, and an empirical example showing evidence of polytomies is analyzed and discussed.

Keywords: Bayesian; phylogenetics; polytomy; reversible-jump MCMC; star tree; unresolved

Received September 18, 2003; Revised October 28, 2003; Accepted December 13, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
D. M. Simon, S. A. Kelchner, and S. Zimmerly
A Broadscale Phylogenetic Analysis of Group II Intron RNAs and Intron-Encoded Reverse Transcriptases
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2795 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. G. Foster, C. J. Cox, and T. M. Embley
The primary divisions of life: a phylogenomic approach employing composition-heterogeneous methods
Phil Trans R Soc B, August 12, 2009; 364(1527): 2197 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. Liu and S. V. Edwards
Phylogenetic Analysis in the Anomaly Zone
Syst Biol, August 1, 2009; 58(4): 452 - 460.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. E. Arnold, J. Miadlikowska, K. L. Higgins, S. D. Sarvate, P. Gugger, A. Way, V. Hofstetter, F. Kauff, and F. Lutzoni
A Phylogenetic Estimation of Trophic Transition Networks for Ascomycetous Fungi: Are Lichens Cradles of Symbiotrophic Fungal Diversification?
Syst Biol, July 11, 2009; (2009) syp001v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. R. Lemmon, J. M. Brown, K. Stanger-Hall, and E. M. Lemmon
The Effect of Ambiguous Data on Phylogenetic Estimates Obtained by Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference
Syst Biol, May 22, 2009; (2009) syp017v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. D. McKenna, A. S. Sequeira, A. E. Marvaldi, and B. D. Farrell
Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants
PNAS, April 28, 2009; 106(17): 7083 - 7088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. J. Bayer, D. J. Mabberley, C. Morton, C. H. Miller, I. K. Sharma, B. E. Pfeil, S. Rich, R. Hitchcock, and S. Sykes
A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily(Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2009; 96(3): 668 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
Z. Yang
Empirical evaluation of a prior for Bayesian phylogenetic inference
Phil Trans R Soc B, December 27, 2008; 363(1512): 4031 - 4039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. C. Regier, J. W. Shultz, A. R. D. Ganley, A. Hussey, D. Shi, B. Ball, A. Zwick, J. E. Stajich, M. P. Cummings, J. W. Martin, et al.
Resolving Arthropod Phylogeny: Exploring Phylogenetic Signal within 41 kb of Protein-Coding Nuclear Gene Sequence
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 920 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Kim and M. J. Sanderson
Penalized Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference: Bridging the Parsimony-Likelihood Gap
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 665 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. Susko
On the Distributions of Bootstrap Support and Posterior Distributions for a Star Tree
Syst Biol, August 1, 2008; 57(4): 602 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Dohrmann, D. Janussen, J. Reitner, A. G. Collins, and G. Worheide
Phylogeny and Evolution of Glass Sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida)
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 388 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T.-K. Seo
Calculating Bootstrap Probabilities of Phylogeny Using Multilocus Sequence Data
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2008; 25(5): 960 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. H. Struck and F. Fisse
Phylogenetic Position of Nemertea Derived from Phylogenomic Data
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2008; 25(4): 728 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. J. M. Koopman, V. Wissemann, K. De Cock, J. Van Huylenbroeck, J. De Riek, G. J. H. Sabatino, D. Visser, B. Vosman, C. M. Ritz, B. Maes, et al.
AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: A case study in Rosa (Rosaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 353 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
E. Benavides, R. Baum, D. McClellan, and J. W. Sites
Molecular Phylogenetics of the Lizard Genus Microlophus (Squamata:Tropiduridae): Aligning and Retrieving Indel Signal from Nuclear Introns
Syst Biol, October 1, 2007; 56(5): 776 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. Kolaczkowski and J. W. Thornton
Effects of Branch Length Uncertainty on Bayesian Posterior Probabilities for Phylogenetic Hypotheses
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2108 - 2118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Z. Yang
Fair-Balance Paradox, Star-tree Paradox, and Bayesian Phylogenetics
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1639 - 1655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
F. Kauff, C. J. Cox, and F. Lutzoni
WASABI: An Automated Sequence Processing System for Multigene Phylogenies
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 523 - 531.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
V. Gowri-Shankar and M. Rattray
A Reversible Jump Method for Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference with a Nonhomogeneous Substitution Model
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2007; 24(6): 1286 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. V. Edwards, L. Liu, and D. K. Pearl
High-resolution species trees without concatenation
PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5936 - 5941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Steel and F. A. Matsen
The Bayesian "Star Paradox" Persists for Long Finite Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2007; 24(4): 1075 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. Ane, B. Larget, D. A. Baum, S. D. Smith, and A. Rokas
Bayesian Estimation of Concordance among Gene Trees
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2007; 24(2): 412 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Anisimova and O. Gascuel
Approximate Likelihood-Ratio Test for Branches: A Fast, Accurate, and Powerful Alternative
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 539 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. R. Buckley, M. Cordeiro, D. C. Marshall, and C. Simon
Differentiating between Hypotheses of Lineage Sorting and Introgression in New Zealand Alpine Cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale)
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 411 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Muller and R. R. Reisz
The Phylogeny of Early Eureptiles: Comparing Parsimony and Bayesian Approaches in the Investigation of a Basal Fossil Clade
Syst Biol, June 1, 2006; 55(3): 503 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. C. Brandley, A. D. Leache, D. L. Warren, and J. A. McGuire
Are Unequal Clade Priors Problematic for Bayesian Phylogenetics?
Syst Biol, February 1, 2006; 55(1): 138 - 146.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.