Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(2):197-217; doi:10.1080/10635150590924181
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koopman, W. J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koopman, W. J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Phylogenetic Signal in AFLP Data Sets

Wim J. M. Koopman

Biosystematics Group, Nationaal Herbarium Nederland — Wageningen University branch, Wageningen University Generaal Foulkesweg 37, 6703BL Wageningen, The Netherlands E-mail: wim.koopman{at}wur.nl


   Abstract

AFLP markers provide a potential source of phylogenetic information for molecular systematic studies. However, there are properties of restriction fragment data that limit phylogenetic interpretation of AFLPs. These are (a) possible nonindependence of fragments, (b) problems of homology assignment of fragments, (c) asymmetry in the probability of losing and gaining fragments, and (d) problems in distinguishing heterozygote from homozygote bands. In the present study, AFLP data sets of Lactuca s.l. were examined for the presence of phylogenetic signal. An indication of this signal was provided by carrying out tree length distribution skewness (g1) tests, permutation tail probability (PTP) tests, and relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA). A measure of the support for internal branches in the optimal parsimony tree (MPT) was made using bootstrap, jackknife, and decay analysis. Finally, the extent of congruence in MPTs for AFLP and internal transcribed spacer (ITS)-1 data sets for the same taxa was made using the partition homogeneity test (PHT) and the Templeton test. These analytical studies suggested the presence of phylogenetic signal in the AFLP data sets, although some incongruence was found between AFLP and ITS MPTs. An extensive literature survey undertaken indicated that authors report a general congruence of AFLP and ITS tree topologies across a wide range of taxonomic groups, suggesting that the present results and conclusions have a general bearing. In these earlier studies and those for Lactuca s.l., AFLP markers have been found to be informative at somewhat lower taxonomic levels than ITS sequences. Tentative estimates are suggested for the levels of ITS sequence divergence over which AFLP profiles are likely to be phylogenetically informative.

Keywords: Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers; congruence; Dollo parsimony; g1 statistic; internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences; Lactuca; partition homogeneity test (PHT); phylogenetic signal

Received February 20, 2002; Revised August 6, 2002; Accepted November 28, 2004


Present Address: Plant Research International B.V., P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
T. E. Wood and T. Nakazato
Investigating species boundaries in the Giliopsis group of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae): Strong discordance among molecular and morphological markers
Am. J. Botany, April 1, 2009; 96(4): 853 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. Diaz-Perez, M. Sequeira, A. Santos-Guerra, and P. Catalan
Multiple Colonizations, In Situ Speciation, and Volcanism-Associated Stepping-Stone Dispersals Shaped the Phylogeography of the Macaronesian Red Fescues (Festuca L., Gramineae)
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 732 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
P. Mereda Jr., I. Hodalova, P. Martonfi, J. Kucera, and J. Lihova
Intraspecific Variation in Viola suavis in Europe: Parallel Evolution of White-flowered Morphotypes
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2008; 102(3): 443 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. R. Holland, A. C. Clarke, and H. M. Meudt
Optimizing Automated AFLP Scoring Parameters to Improve Phylogenetic Resolution
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 347 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
W. J. M. Koopman, V. Wissemann, K. De Cock, J. Van Huylenbroeck, J. De Riek, G. J. H. Sabatino, D. Visser, B. Vosman, C. M. Ritz, B. Maes, et al.
AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: A case study in Rosa (Rosaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 353 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
G. E. McKinnon, R. E. Vaillancourt, D. A. Steane, and B. M. Potts
An AFLP marker approach to lower-level systematics in Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae)
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2008; 95(3): 368 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
D. S. Devey, R. M. Bateman, M. F. Fay, and J. A. Hawkins
Friends or Relatives? Phylogenetics and Species Delimitation in the Controversial European Orchid Genus Ophrys
Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 385 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. M. Althoff, M. A. Gitzendanner, and K. A. Segraves
The Utility of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms in Phylogenetics: A Comparison of Homology within and between Genomes
Syst Biol, June 1, 2007; 56(3): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. K. Archibald, D. J. Crawford, A. Santos-Guerra, and M. E. Mort
The utility of automated analysis of inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) loci for resolving relationships in the Canary Island species of Tolpis (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2006; 93(8): 1154 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.