Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(1):66-76; doi:10.1080/10635150590906055
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holland, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holland, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Visualizing Conflicting Evolutionary Hypotheses in Large Collections of Trees: Using Consensus Networks to Study the Origins of Placentals and Hexapods

Barbara R. Holland1, Frédéric Delsuc1,3, Vincent Moulton2 and Allan Baker, Assiciate Editor

1 The Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University Private Bag 11 222, Palmerston North, New Zealand E-mail: b.r.holland{at}massey.ac.nz
2 The Linnaeus Centre for Bioinformatics, Uppsala University Sweden


   Abstract

Many phylogenetic methods produce large collections of trees as opposed to a single tree, which allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. However, to be useful, the information contained in large collections of trees should be summarized; frequently this is achieved by constructing a consensus tree. Consensus trees display only those signals that are present in a large proportion of the trees. However, by their very nature consensus trees require that any conflicts between the trees are necessarily disregarded. We present a method that extends the notion of consensus trees to allow the visualization of conflicting hypotheses in a consensus network. We demonstrate the utility of this method in highlighting differences amongst maximum likelihood bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities in the placental mammal phylogeny, and also in comparing the phylogenetic signal contained in amino acid versus nucleotide characters for hexapod monophyly.

Keywords: Bayesian posterior probabilities; consensus trees; hexapods; median networks; nonparametric bootstrap; placental mammals; phylogenetic trees; quartet puzzling

Received December 17, 2003; Revised August 3, 2004; Accepted September 12, 2004


3 Present Address: Département de Biochimie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. Guggisberg, G. Mansion, and E. Conti
Disentangling Reticulate Evolution in an Arctic-Alpine Polyploid Complex
Syst Biol, June 4, 2009; (2009) syp010v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
N. P. French, A. Midwinter, B. Holland, J. Collins-Emerson, R. Pattison, F. Colles, and P. Carter
Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni Isolates from Wild-Bird Fecal Material in Children's Playgrounds
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2009; 75(3): 779 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. R. Holland, A. C. Clarke, and H. M. Meudt
Optimizing Automated AFLP Scoring Parameters to Improve Phylogenetic Resolution
Syst Biol, June 1, 2008; 57(3): 347 - 366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. K. M. Kulju, S. E. C. Sierra, S. G. A. Draisma, R. Samuel, and P. C. v. Welzen
Molecular phylogeny of Macaranga, Mallotus, and related genera (Euphorbiaceae s.s.): insights from plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2007; 94(10): 1726 - 1743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
W. White, S. Hills, R Gaddam, B. Holland, and D. Penny
Treeness Triangles: Visualizing the Loss of Phylogenetic Signal
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2007; 24(9): 2029 - 2039.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
O. Gauthier and F.-J. Lapointe
Seeing the Trees for the Network: Consensus, Information Content, and Superphylogenies
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 345 - 355.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. Holland, G. Conner, K. Huber, and V. Moulton
Imputing Supertrees and Supernetworks from Quartets
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 57 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
G. C. Gibb, O. Kardailsky, R. T. Kimball, E. L. Braun, and D. Penny
Mitochondrial Genomes and Avian Phylogeny: Complex Characters and Resolvability without Explosive Radiations
Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2007; 24(1): 269 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. Bonnard, V. Berry, and N. Lartillot
Multipolar Consensus for Phylogenetic Trees
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 837 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. J. Pierson, R. Martinez-Arias, B. R. Holland, N. J. Gemmell, M. E. Hurles, and D. Penny
Deciphering Past Human Population Movements in Oceania: Provably Optimal Trees of 127 mtDNA Genomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2006; 23(10): 1966 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
B. R. Holland, L. S. Jermiin, and V. Moulton
Improved Consensus Network Techniques for Genome-Scale Phylogeny
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2006; 23(5): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Kennedy, B. R. Holland, R. D. Gray, and H. G. Spencer
Untangling Long Branches: Identifying Conflicting Phylogenetic Signals Using Spectral Analysis, Neighbor-Net, and Consensus Networks
Syst Biol, August 1, 2005; 54(4): 620 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.