Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(1):4-20; doi:10.1080/10635150590906028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogler, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barraclough, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vogler, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Barraclough, T. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Exploring Rate Variation Among and Within Sites in a Densely Sampled Tree: Species Level Phylogenetics of North American Tiger Beetles (Genus Cicindela)

Alfried P. Vogler1,2, Anabela Cardoso1,3 and Timothy G. Barraclough2,4

1 Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom E-mail: a.vogler{at}nhm.ac.uk
2 Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom
3 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Rua Ernesto Vasconcelos 1749–016, Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal
4 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew TW9 3DS, United Kingdom

Edited by Ziheng Yang: Assiciate Editor


   Abstract

Species-level phylogenetic studies require fast-evolving nucleotide positions to resolve relationships among close relatives, but these sites may be highly homoplastic and perhaps uninformative or even misleading deeper in the tree. Here we describe a species-level analysis of tiger beetles in the genus Cicindela (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) for 132 terminal taxa and 1897 nucleotide positions from three regions of mtDNA, comprising 75% coverage of species occurring in North America. Evenly weighted parsimony analysis recovered four major clades representing radiations confined to North and Central America. Relationships near the tips were well supported but signal was contradictory at deeper nodes. Two major categories (3rd positions and all others) can be distinguished in likelihood analysis of character variation, of which only the fast-changing 3rd position characters were affected by saturation. However, their downweighting under a variety of criteria did not improve the tree topology at basal nodes. There was weak conflict between 3rd and non-3rd position characters deep in the tree, but support levels declined towards the root for all categories, even on trees that were reconstructed from 3rd and non-3rd positions separately. Statistical analysis of parsimony-based character transitions along branches showed a largely homogeneous distribution of change along the root-to-tip axis. The comparison of character transitions among the four major portions of the tree revealed deviations from stochastic distribution for the non-3rd positions, but not for 3rd positions. Hence, variability of functionally constrained non-3rd positions differs between clades and may be dependent on the character states at other sites, consistent with the covarion model of molecular evolution. The results suggest that some properties of 3rd positions are less problematic for phylogenetic reconstruction than other categories despite their high total homoplasy. In densely sampled data sets of closely related species, the disadvantages of weighting schemes according to homoplasy levels outweigh the benefits, showing the difficulty of devising meaningful weighting schemes that are applicable universally throughout the tree.

Keywords: Coleoptera; heterotachy; homoplasy weighting; mtDNA; nodal support; rate variation; saturation; species level phylogenies

Received November 1, 2001; Revised April 5, 2002; Accepted August 17, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Pons, T. G. Barraclough, J. Gomez-Zurita, A. Cardoso, D. P. Duran, S. Hazell, S. Kamoun, W. D. Sumlin, and A. P. Vogler
Sequence-Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 595 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
W. Hordijk and O. Gascuel
Improving the efficiency of SPR moves in phylogenetic tree search methods based on maximum likelihood
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2005; 21(24): 4338 - 4347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
M. Blaxter, J. Mann, T. Chapman, F. Thomas, C. Whitton, R. Floyd, and E. Abebe
Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 29, 2005; 360(1462): 1935 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.