Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2004 53(5):767-780; doi:10.1080/10635150490522331
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Losada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Losada, M.
Right arrow Articles by Crandall, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists

Molecular Systematics and Biogeography of the Southern South American Freshwater "Crabs" Aegla (Decapoda: Anomura: Aeglidae) Using Multiple Heuristic Tree Search Approaches

Marcos Pérez-Losada1, Georgina Bond-Buckup2, Carlos G. Jara3 and Keith A. Crandall1,4

1 Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University Provo Utah 84602–5181, USA; E-mail: mp323{at}email.byu.edu (M.P.-L.)
2 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Porto Alegre Brazil
3 Instituto de Zoología Casilla 567, Universidad Austral de Chile Valdivia, Chile
4 Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University Provo Utah 84602, USA

Edited by Chris Simon: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Recently new heuristic genetic algorithms such as Treefinder and MetaGA have been developed to search for optimal trees in a maximum likelihood (ML) framework. In this study we combined these methods with other standard heuristic approaches such as ML and maximum parsimony hill-climbing searches and Bayesian inference coupled with Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques under homogeneous and mixed models of evolution to conduct an extensive phylogenetic analysis of the most abundant and widely distributed southern South American freshwater "crab," the Aegla (Anomura: Aeglidae). A total of 167 samples representing 64 Aegla species and subspecies were sequenced for one nuclear (28S rDNA) and four mitochondrial (12S and 16S rDNA, COI, and COII) genes (5352 bp total). Additionally, six other anomuran species from the genera Munida, Pachycheles, and Uroptychus (Galatheoidea), Lithodes (Paguroidea), and Lomis (Lomisoidea) and the nuclear 18S rDNA gene (1964 bp) were included in preliminary analyses for rooting the Aegla tree. Nonsignificantly different phylogenetic hypotheses resulted from all the different heuristic methods used here, although the best scored topologies found under the ML hill-climbing, Bayesian, and MetaGA approaches showed considerably better likelihood scores ({Delta} > 54) than those found under the MP and Treefinder approaches. Our trees provided strong support for most of the recognized Aegla species except for A. cholchol, A. jarai, A. parana, A. marginata, A. platensis, and A. franciscana, which may actually represent multiple species. Geographically, the Aegla group was divided into a basal western clade (21 species and subspecies) composed of two subclades with overlapping distributions, and a more recent central-eastern clade (43 species) composed of three subclades with fairly well-recognized distributions. This result supports the Pacific-Origin Hypothesis postulated for the group; alternative hypotheses of Atlantic or multiple origins were significantly rejected by our analyses. Finally, we combined our phylogenetic results with previous hypotheses of South American paleodrainages since the Jurassic to propose a biogeographical framework of the Aegla radiation.

Keywords: Aegla; Anomura; biogeography; genetic algorithms; heuristic search; large phylogeny; mitochondrial and nuclear DNA; mixed models

Received October 22, 2003; Revised March 7, 2004; Accepted March 7, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.