Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2004 53(3):506-514; doi:10.1080/10635150490445922
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (91)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjer, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kjer, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists

Aligned 18S and Insect Phylogeny

Karl M. Kjer

Department of Ecology Evolution and Natural Resources 14 College Farm Road, Cook College, Rutgers University New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA; E-mail: kjer{at}aesop.rutgers.edu

Edited by Thomas Buckley: Associate Editor


   Abstract

The nuclear small subunit rRNA (18S) has played a dominant role in the estimation of relationships among insect orders from molecular data. In previous studies, 18S sequences have been aligned by unadjusted automated approaches (computer alignments that are not manually readjusted), most recently with direct optimization (simultaneous alignment and tree building using a program called "POY"). Parsimony has been the principal optimality criterion. Given the problems associated with the alignment of rRNA, and the recent availability of the doublet model for the analysis of covarying sites using Bayesian MCMC analysis, a different approach is called for in the analysis of these data. In this paper, nucleotide sequence data from the 18S small subunit rRNA gene of insects are aligned manually with reference to secondary structure, and analyzed under Bayesian phylogenetic methods with both GTR+I+G and doublet models in MrBayes. A credible phylogeny of Insecta is recovered that is independent of the morphological data and (unlike many other analyses of 18S in insects) not contradictory to traditional ideas of insect ordinal relationships based on morphology. Hexapoda, including Collembola, are monophyletic. Paraneoptera are the sister taxon to a monophyletic Holometabola but weakly supported. Ephemeroptera are supported as the sister taxon of Neoptera, and this result is interpreted with respect to the evolution of direct sperm transfer and the evolution of flight. Many other relationships are well-supported but several taxa remain problematic, e.g., there is virtually no support for relationships among orthopteroid orders. A website is made available that provides aligned 18S data in formats that include structural symbols and Nexus formats.

Keywords: 18S; alignment; doublet model; Insecta; Paleoptera

Received October 3, 2003; Revised November 17, 2003; Accepted February 4, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Simon, S. Strauss, A. von Haeseler, and H. Hadrys
A Phylogenomic Approach to Resolve the Basal Pterygote Divergence
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2719 - 2730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. R. Stocsits, H. Letsch, J. Hertel, B. Misof, and P. F. Stadler
Accurate and efficient reconstruction of deep phylogenies from structured RNAs
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(18): 6184 - 6193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
A. R. Gruber, C. Kilgus, A. Mosig, I. L. Hofacker, W. Hennig, and P. F. Stadler
Arthropod 7SK RNA
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2008; 25(9): 1923 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. H. Ogden and M. S. Rosenberg
Alignment and Topological Accuracy of the Direct Optimization approach via POY and Traditional Phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAUP
Syst Biol, April 1, 2007; 56(2): 182 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
K. M. Kjer, J. J. Gillespie, and K. A. Ober
Opinions on Multiple Sequence Alignment, and an Empirical Comparison of Repeatability and Accuracy between POY and Structural Alignment
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 133 - 146.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
A. B. Smythe, M. J. Sanderson, and S. A. Nadler
Nematode Small Subunit Phylogeny Correlates with Alignment Parameters
Syst Biol, December 1, 2006; 55(6): 972 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
D. C. Marshall, C. Simon, and T. R. Buckley
Accurate Branch Length Estimation in Partitioned Bayesian Analyses Requires Accommodation of Among-Partition Rate Variation and Attention to Branch Length Priors
Syst Biol, December 1, 2006; 55(6): 993 - 1003.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
T. H. Ogden and M. S. Rosenberg
Multiple Sequence Alignment Accuracy and Phylogenetic Inference
Syst Biol, April 1, 2006; 55(2): 314 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
M. A. MATTHIAS, M. M. DIAZ, K. J. CAMPOS, M. CALDERON, M. R. WILLIG, V. PACHECO, E. GOTUZZO, R. H. GILMAN, and J. M. VINETZ
DIVERSITY OF BAT-ASSOCIATED LEPTOSPIRA IN THE PERUVIAN AMAZON INFERRED BY BAYESIAN PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF 16S RIBOSOMAL DNA SEQUENCES
Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 964 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
Y.-x. Luan, J. M. Mallatt, R.-d. Xie, Y.-m. Yang, and W.-y. Yin
The Phylogenetic Positions of Three Basal-Hexapod Groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) Based on Ribosomal RNA Gene Sequences
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1579 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. J. Gillespie, J. B. Munro, J. M. Heraty, M. J. Yoder, A. K. Owen, and A. E. Carmichael
A Secondary Structural Model of the 28S rRNA Expansion Segments D2 and D3 for Chalcidoid Wasps (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)
Mol. Biol. Evol., July 1, 2005; 22(7): 1593 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.