Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2004 53(1):1-17; doi:10.1080/10635150490424376
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirchoff, B.K.
Right arrow Articles by Wisniewski, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kirchoff, B.K.
Right arrow Articles by Wisniewski, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists

Complex Data Produce Better Characters

B.K. Kirchoff1, S.J. Richter2, D.L. Remington1 and E. Wisniewski3

1 Department of Biology P. O. Box 26170 University of North Carolina Greensboro, North Carolina 27402, USA; E-mail: kirchoff{at}uncg.edu (B.K.K.), dlreming{at}uncg.edu (D.L.R.)
2 Statistics Division, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of North Carolina Greensboro North Carolina 27402, USA; E-mail: sjricht2{at}uncg.edu
3 Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Greensboro North Carolina 27402, USA; E-mail: edw{at}uncg.edu

Edited by Pamela Soltis: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Two studies were conducted to explore the use of complex data in character description and hybrid identification. In order to determine if complex data allow the production of better characters, eight groups of plant systematists were given two classes of drawings of plant parts, and asked to divide them into character states (clusters) in two separate experiments. The first class of drawings consisted only of cotyledons. The second class consisted of triplets of drawings: a cotyledon, seedling leaf, and inflorescence bract. The triplets were used to simulate complex data such as might be garnered by looking at a plant. Each experiment resulted in four characters (groups of clusters), one for each group of systematists. Visual and statistical analysis of the data showed that the systematists were able to produce smaller, more precisely defined character states using the more complex drawings. The character states created with the complex drawings also were more consistent across systematists, and agreed more closely with an independent assessment of phylogeny. To investigate the utility of complex data in an applied task, four observers rated 250 hybrids of Dubautia ciliolata X arborea based on the overall form (Gestalt) of the plants, and took measurements of a number of features of the same plants. A composite score of the measurements was created using principal components analysis. The correlation between the scores on the first principal component and the Gestalt ratings was computed. The Gestalt ratings and PC scores were significantly correlated, demonstrating that assessments of overall similarity can be as useful as more conventional approaches in determining the hybrid status of plants.

Keywords: Analytic processing; Banskia; character; character state; complexity; configural processing; Dubautia; holistic processing; phylogenetic analysis

Received September 11, 2002; Revised February 9, 2003; Accepted September 19, 2003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. C. Brandley, D. L. Warren, A. D. Leache, and J. A. McGuire
Homoplasy and Clade Support
Syst Biol, June 29, 2009; (2009) syp019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
B. R. Moore, S. A. Smith, and M. J. Donoghue
Increasing Data Transparency and Estimating Phylogenetic Uncertainty in Supertrees: Approaches Using Nonparametric Bootstrapping
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 662 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
A. K Monro
The revision of species-rich genera: a phylogenetic framework for the strategic revision of Pilea (Urticaceae) based on cpDNA, nrDNA, and morphology
Am. J. Botany, March 1, 2006; 93(3): 426 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
V. Novotny and Y. Basset
Host specificity of insect herbivores in tropical forests
Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2005; 272(1568): 1083 - 1090.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. Perez-Losada, G. Bond-Buckup, C. G. Jara, and K. A. Crandall
Molecular Systematics and Biogeography of the Southern South American Freshwater "Crabs" Aegla (Decapoda: Anomura: Aeglidae) Using Multiple Heuristic Tree Search Approaches
Syst Biol, October 1, 2004; 53(5): 767 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.