Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(5):852-859; doi:10.1080/10635150500354886
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, P. D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hebert, P. D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

The Promise of DNA Barcoding for Taxonomy

Edited by Vincent Savolainen

Paul D. N. Hebert and T. Ryan Gregory

Department of Integrative Biology, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada; E-mail: phebert@uoguelph.ca (P.D.N.H.)

Received April 25, 2005; Revised June 9, 2005; Accepted July 12, 2005
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

DNA barcoding is a novel system designed to provide rapid, accurate, and automatable species identifications by using short, standardized gene regions as internal species tags. As a consequence, it will make the Linnaean taxonomic system more accessible, with benefits to ecologists, conservationists, and the diversity of agencies charged with the control of pests, invasive species, and food safety. More broadly, DNA barcoding allows a day to be envisioned when every curious mind, from professional biologists to schoolchildren, will have easy access to the names and biological attributes of any species on the planet. In addition to assigning specimens to known species, DNA barcoding will accelerate the pace of species discovery by allowing taxonomists to rapidly sort specimens and by highlighting divergent taxa that may represent new species. By augmenting their capabilities in these ways, DNA barcoding offers taxonomists the opportunity to greatly expand, and eventually complete, a global inventory of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Questions
 
1. Given two billion US dollars (the amount a comprehensive program of DNA barcoding is estimated to cost [Whitfield, 2003]), how would you spend this money to benefit taxonomic and biodiversity research, and what would be the legacy of these data?
2. Globally, alpha taxonomic research (the discovery and description of new species) is in crisis. Is DNA barcoding an expedient solution to this problem or will it expedite its decline?
3. Overlapping character variation between and within species is well documented for many character systems. Why is this any more or less of a problem for DNA barcoding?
4. Many taxonomists already practice DNA barcoding informally when delimiting and discovering species. Is this wrong, and what data are sufficient to demonstrate that a series of specimens represents a new species with traditional or barcoding methods?
5. The proposed barcoding genes can fail to recover accurate species trees. Does this matter for DNA barcoding?
6. Some species are not mitochondrially monophyletic, sharing polymorphisms with unrelated taxa. How will this affect identifications using a barcoding approach?
7. Should the completion of a DNA barcoding program ever occur, would this mark the beginning or end of taxonomic and biodiversity research, and what will be the role of systematists in a world where most identifications are done by "barcode"?
8. Would the inevitable expansion of sequencing efforts that would come with a program of DNA barcoding be concomitant with a decline in the quality of taxonomic research?
9. Assuming the technical problems of DNA barcoding can be overcome, is it now, or will it ever be cost-effective relative to traditional methods to use DNA barcodes for bioinventory purposes?
10. Hypothesis-driven research is the foundation upon which most research agencies assign funding priorities, yet taxonomy is discovery driven. How would your approach to taxonomy convince these agencies of the merits of taxonomic studies?

    Position Statement
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
P. R. Steele, L. M. Friar, L. E. Gilbert, and R. K. Jansen
Molecular systematics of the neotropical genus Psiguria (Cucurbitaceae): Implications for phylogeny and species identification
Am. J. Botany, January 1, 2010; 97(1): 156 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. T. Monaghan, R. Wild, M. Elliot, T. Fujisawa, M. Balke, D. J.G. Inward, D. C. Lees, R. Ranaivosolo, P. Eggleton, T. G. Barraclough, et al.
Accelerated Species Inventory on Madagascar Using Coalescent-Based Models of Species Delineation
Syst Biol, July 1, 2009; (2009) syp027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
A. Papadopoulou, J. Bergsten, T. Fujisawa, M. T Monaghan, T. G Barraclough, and A. P Vogler
Speciation and DNA barcodes: testing the effects of dispersal on the formation of discrete sequence clusters
Phil Trans R Soc B, September 27, 2008; 363(1506): 2987 - 2996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Song, J. E. Buhay, M. F. Whiting, and K. A. Crandall
Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified
PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13486 - 13491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Elias, R. I Hill, K. R Willmott, K. K Dasmahapatra, A. V.Z Brower, J. Mallet, and C. D Jiggins
Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies
Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2007; 274(1627): 2881 - 2889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Taberlet, E. Coissac, F. Pompanon, L. Gielly, C. Miquel, A. Valentini, T. Vermat, G. Corthier, C. Brochmann, and E. Willerslev
Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding
Nucleic Acids Res., February 16, 2007; 35(3): e14 - e14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
A. Gomez, P. J Wright, D. H Lunt, J. M Cancino, G. R Carvalho, and R. N Hughes
Mating trials validate the use of DNA barcoding to reveal cryptic speciation of a marine bryozoan taxon
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 199 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. H. Cannon, C. S. Kua, E. K. Lobenhofer, and P. Hurban
Capturing genomic signatures of DNA sequence variation using a standard anonymous microarray platform
Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2006; 34(18): e121 - e121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. Meier, K. Shiyang, G. Vaidya, and P. K. L. Ng
DNA Barcoding and Taxonomy in Diptera: A Tale of High Intraspecific Variability and Low Identification Success
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 715 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Pons, T. G. Barraclough, J. Gomez-Zurita, A. Cardoso, D. P. Duran, S. Hazell, S. Kamoun, W. D. Sumlin, and A. P. Vogler
Sequence-Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects
Syst Biol, August 1, 2006; 55(4): 595 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
T. G. Lilburn, S. H. Harrison, J. R. Cole, and G. M. Garrity
Computational aspects of systematic biology
Brief Bioinform, June 1, 2006; 7(2): 186 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]