Skip Navigation


Systematic Biology Advance Access originally published online on October 21, 2009
Systematic Biology 2009 58(6):612-628; doi:10.1093/sysbio/syp068
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
58/6/612    most recent
syp068v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirie, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Linder, H. P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pirie, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Linder, H. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author(s) 2009. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reticulation, Data Combination, and Inferring Evolutionary History: An Example from Danthonioideae (Poaceae)

Michael D. Pirie1,2,*, Aelys M. Humphreys1, Nigel P. Barker3 and H. Peter Linder1

1 Institute for Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
2 Present address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa
3 Molecular Ecology and Systematics Group, Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa

* Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Biochemistry, University of Stellenbosch, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, Stellenbosch, South Africa; E-mail: mpirie{at}sun.ac.za.


   Abstract

We explore the potential impact of conflicting gene trees on inferences of evolutionary history above the species level. When conflict between gene trees is discovered, it is common practice either to analyze the data separately or to combine the data having excluded the conflicting taxa or data partitions for those taxa (which are then recoded as missing). We demonstrate an alternative approach, which involves duplicating conflicting taxa in the matrix, such that each duplicate is represented by one partition only. This allows the combination of all available data in standard phylogenetic analyses, despite reticulations. We show how interpretation of contradictory gene trees can lead to conflicting inferences of both morphological evolution and biogeographic history, using the example of the pampas grasses, Cortaderia. The characteristic morphological syndrome of Cortaderia can be inferred as having arisen multiple times (chloroplast DNA [cpDNA]) or just once (nuclear ribosomal DNA [nrDNA]). The distributions of species of Cortaderia and related genera in Australia/New Guinea, New Zealand, and South America can be explained by few (nrDNA) or several (cpDNA) dispersals between the southern continents. These contradictions can be explained by past hybridization events, which have linked gains of complex morphologies with unrelated chloroplast lineages and have erased evidence of dispersals from the nuclear genome. Given the discrepancies between inferences based on the gene trees individually, we urge the use of approaches such as ours that take multiple gene trees into account.

Keywords: Biogeography; Cortaderia; Danthonioideae; gynodioecy; hybridization; incongruence; molecular dating; phylogeny

Received February 8, 2008; Revised June 13, 2008; Accepted September 8, 2009


Associate Editor: Roberta J. Mason-Gamer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.