Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(5):795-808; doi:10.1080/10635150802422282
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renner, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ricklefs, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Renner, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Ricklefs, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

Rooting and Dating Maples (Acer) with an Uncorrelated-Rates Molecular Clock: Implications for North American/Asian Disjunctions

Susanne S. Renner1, Guido W. Grimm2, Gerald M. Schneeweiss3, Tod F. Stuessy4 and Robert E. Ricklefs5

1 Department of Biology, University of Munich D-80638 Munich, Germany; E-mail: renner{at}lrz.uni-muenchen.de
2 Institute of Geosciences, University of Tuebingen D-72076, Tuebingen, Germany
3 Department of Biogeography and Botanical Garden, University of Vienna A-1030 Vienna, Austria
4 Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna A-1030 Vienna, Austria
5 Department of Biology, University of Missouri–St. Louis St. Louis, Missouri 63121, USA


   Abstract

Simulations suggest that molecular clock analyses can correctly identify the root of a tree even when the clock assumption is severely violated. Clock-based rooting of phylogenies may be particularly useful when outgroup rooting is problematic. Here, we explore relaxed-clock rooting in the Acer/Dipteronia clade of Sapindaceae, which comprises genera of highly uneven species richness and problematic mutual monophyly. Using an approach that does not presuppose rate autocorrelation between ancestral and descendant branches and hence does not require a rooted a priori topology, we analyzed data from up to seven chloroplast loci for some 50 ingroup species. For comparison, we used midpoint and outgroup rooting and dating methods that rely on rooted input trees, namely penalized likelihood, a Bayesian autocorrelated-rates model, and a strict clock. The chloroplast sequences used here reject a single global substitution rate, and the assumption of autocorrelated rates was also rejected. The root was placed between Acer and Dipteronia by all three rooting methods, albeit with low statistical support. Analyses of Acer diversification with a lineage-through-time plot and different survival models, although sensitive to missing data, suggest a gradual decrease in the average diversification rate. The nine North American species of Acer diverged from their nearest relatives at widely different times: eastern American Acer diverged in the Oligocene and Late Miocene; western American species in the Late Eocene and Mid Miocene; and the Acer core clade, including A. saccharum, dates to the Miocene. Recent diversification in North America is strikingly rare compared to diversification in eastern Asia.

Keywords: Bayes factors; biogeography; Bayesian relaxed clock; Beringian disjunctions; rooting of phylogenies; substitution rates

Received November 1, 2007; Revised January 28, 2008; Accepted July 15, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Ackerly
Colloquium Papers: Conservatism and diversification of plant functional traits: Evolutionary rates versus phylogenetic signal
PNAS, November 17, 2009; 106(Supplement_2): 19699 - 19706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.