Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(3):406-419; doi:10.1080/10635150802166046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huelsenbeck, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ronquist, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Huelsenbeck, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ronquist, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

A Bayesian Perspective on a Non-parsimonious Parsimony Model

John P. Huelsenbeck1, Cécile Ané2,3, Bret Larget2,3 and Fredrik Ronquist4

1 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California Berkeley 3060 VLSB No. 3140, Berkeley, CA 94720-3140, USA; E-mail: johnh{at}berkeley.edu
2 Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
3 Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA
4 Swedish Museum of Natural History Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden

Edited by Marc Suchard


   Abstract

Several stochastic models of character change, when implemented in a maximum likelihood framework, are known to give a correspondence between the maximum parsimony method and the method of maximum likelihood. One such model has an independently estimated branch-length parameter for each site and each branch of the phylogenetic tree. This model—the no-common-mechanism model—has many parameters, and, in fact, the number of parameters increases as fast as the alignment is extended. We take a Bayesian approach to the no-common-mechanism model and place independent gamma prior probability distributions on the branch-length parameters. We are able to analytically integrate over the branch lengths, and this allowed us to implement an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo method for exploring the space of phylogenetic trees. We were able to reliably estimate the posterior probabilities of clades for phylogenetic trees of up to 500 sequences. However, the Bayesian approach to the problem, at least as implemented here with an independent prior on the length of each branch, does not tame the behavior of the branch-length parameters. The integrated likelihood appears to be a simple rescaling of the parsimony score for a tree, and the marginal posterior probability distribution of the length of a branch is dependent upon how the maximum parsimony method reconstructs the characters at the interior nodes of the tree. The method we describe, however, is of potential importance in the analysis of morphological character data and also for improving the behavior of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods implemented for models in which sites share a common branch-length parameter.

Keywords: Bayesian phylogenetic inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; maximum likelihood; parsimony model

Received May 11, 2007; Revised August 8, 2007; Accepted January 14, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Wu and E. Susko
General Heterotachy and Distance Method Adjustments
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2689 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Kim and M. J. Sanderson
Penalized Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference: Bridging the Parsimony-Likelihood Gap
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 665 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.