Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(2):243-250; doi:10.1080/10635150802033014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Steel, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rodrigo, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

Maximum Likelihood Supertrees

Mike Steel1 and Allen Rodrigo2

1 Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand; E-mail: m.steel{at}math.canterbury.ac.nz
2 The Bioinformatics Institute and the Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Auckland New Zealand and Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microelectronique de Montpellier France; E-mail: a.rodrigo{at}auckland.ac.nz


   Abstract

We analyze a maximum likelihood approach for combining phylogenetic trees into a larger "supertree." This is based on a simple exponential model of phylogenetic error, which ensures that ML supertrees have a simple combinatorial description (as a median tree, minimizing a weighted sum of distances to the input trees). We show that this approach to ML supertree reconstruction is statistically consistent (it converges on the true species supertree as more input trees are combined), in contrast to the widely used MRP method, which we show can be statistically inconsistent under the exponential error model. We also show that this statistical consistency extends to an ML approach for constructing species supertrees from gene trees. In this setting, incomplete lineage sorting (due to coalescence rates of homologous genes being lower than speciation rates) has been shown to lead to gene trees that are frequently different from species trees, and this can confound efforts to reconstruct the species phylogeny correctly.

Keywords: Gene tree; maximum likelihood; phylogenetic supertree; species tree; statistical consistency

Received August 15, 2007; Revised November 19, 2007; Accepted January 15, 2008
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Simon, S. Strauss, A. von Haeseler, and H. Hadrys
A Phylogenomic Approach to Resolve the Basal Pterygote Divergence
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2009; 26(12): 2719 - 2730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
L. Liu, L. Yu, D. K. Pearl, and S. V. Edwards
Estimating Species Phylogenies Using Coalescence Times among Sequences
Syst Biol, October 1, 2009; 58(5): 468 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
J. Dong and D. Fernandez-Baca
Properties of Majority-Rule Supertrees
Syst Biol, July 3, 2009; (2009) syp032v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Torices and A. A. Anderberg
Phylogenetic analysis of sexual systems in Inuleae (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 1011 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. T. Holder, J. Sukumaran, and P. O. Lewis
A Justification for Reporting the Majority-Rule Consensus Tree in Bayesian Phylogenetics
Syst Biol, October 1, 2008; 57(5): 814 - 821.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.