Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2008 57(1):141-156; doi:10.1080/10635150801910451
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ekman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wedin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ekman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wedin, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 Society of Systematic Biologists

The Limitations of Ancestral State Reconstruction and the Evolution of the Ascus in the Lecanorales (Lichenized Ascomycota)

Stefan Ekman1,3, Heidi L. Andersen2,3 and Mats Wedin4

1 Museum of Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University Norbyvägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; E-mail: stefan.ekman{at}evolmuseum.uu.se (S.E.)
2 The Arboretum and Botanical Garden, Museum of Natural History, University of Bergen Allégaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
3 Department of Biology, University of Bergen Allégaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway
4 Cryptogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History P.O. Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden

Edited by Thomas Buckley


   Abstract

Ancestral state reconstructions of morphological or ecological traits on molecular phylogenies are becoming increasingly frequent. They rely on constancy of character state change rates over trees, a correlation between neutral genetic change and phenotypic change, as well as on adequate likelihood models and (for Bayesian methods) prior distributions. This investigation explored the outcomes of a variety of methods for reconstructing discrete ancestral state in the ascus apex of the Lecanorales, a group containing the majority of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Evolution of this character complex has been highly controversial in lichen systematics for more than two decades. The phylogeny was estimated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inference on DNA sequence alignments of three genes (small subunit of the mitochondrial rDNA, large subunit of the nuclear rDNA, and largest subunit of RNA polymerase II). We designed a novel method for assessing the suitable number of discrete gamma categories, which relies on the effect on phylogeny estimates rather than on likelihoods. Ancestral state reconstructions were performed using maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood on a posterior tree sample as well as two fully Bayesian methods. Resulting reconstructions were often strikingly different depending on the method used; different methods often assign high confidence to different states at a given node. The two fully Bayesian methods disagree about the most probable reconstruction in about half of the nodes, even when similar likelihood models and similar priors are used. We suggest that similar studies should use several methods, awaiting an improved understanding of the statistical properties of the methods. A Lecanora-type ascus may have been ancestral in the Lecanorales. State transformations counts, obtained using stochastic mapping, indicate that the number of state changes is 12 to 24, which is considerably greater than the minimum three changes needed to explain the four observed ascus apex types. Apparently, the ascus in the Lecanorales is far more apt to change than has been recognized. Phylogeny corresponds well with morphology, although it partly contradicts currently used delimitations of the Crocyniaceae, Haematommataceae, Lecanoraceae, Megalariaceae, Mycoblastaceae, Pilocarpaceae, Psoraceae, Ramalinaceae, Scoliciosporaceae, and Squamarinaceae.

Keywords: Phylogeny; ancestral state reconstruction; discrete gamma categories; stochastic mapping; ascomycetes; lichens; Lecanorales; ascus

Received June 28, 2007; Revised September 10, 2007; Accepted November 30, 2007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
C. E. Hinchliff and E. H. Roalson
Stem architecture in Eleocharis subgenus Limnochloa (Cyperaceae): Evidence of dynamic morphological evolution in a group of pantropical sedges
Am. J. Botany, August 1, 2009; 96(8): 1487 - 1499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
C. L. Schoch, G.-H. Sung, F. Lopez-Giraldez, J. P. Townsend, J. Miadlikowska, V. Hofstetter, B. Robbertse, P. B. Matheny, F. Kauff, Z. Wang, et al.
The Ascomycota Tree of Life: A Phylum-wide Phylogeny Clarifies the Origin and Evolution of Fundamental Reproductive and Ecological Traits
Syst Biol, June 4, 2009; (2009) syp020v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
R. Torices and A. A. Anderberg
Phylogenetic analysis of sexual systems in Inuleae (Asteraceae)
Am. J. Botany, May 1, 2009; 96(5): 1011 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SIMHome page
C. Gueidan, C. R. Villasenor, G. S. de Hoog, A. A. Gorbushina, W. A. Untereiner, and F. Lutzoni
A rock-inhabiting ancestor for mutualistic and pathogen-rich fungal lineages.
Stud Mycol, January 1, 2008; 61: 111 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.