Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2007 56(5):753-766; doi:10.1080/10635150701627296
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cobbett, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, M. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cobbett, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wills, M. A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2007 Society of Systematic Biologists

Fossils Impact as Hard as Living Taxa in Parsimony Analyses of Morphology

Andrea Cobbett1, Mark Wilkinson2 and Matthew A Wills1

1 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, The University of Bath The Avenue, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK E-mail: M.A.Wills{at}bath.ac.uk
2 Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London, SW7 5BD, UK

Edited by Jack Sullivan


  Abstract

Systematists disagree whether data from fossils should be included in parsimony analyses. In a handful of well-documented cases, the addition of fossil data radically overturns a hypothesis of relationships based on extant taxa alone. Fossils can break up long branches and preserve character combinations closer in time to deep splitting events. However, fossils usually require more interpretation than extant taxa, introducing greater potential for spurious codings. Moreover, because fossils often have more "missing" codings, they are frequently accused of increasing numbers of MPTs, frustrating resolution and reducing support. Despite the controversy, remarkably little is known about the effects of fossils more generally. Here we provide the first systematic study, investigating empirically the behavior of fossil and extant taxa in 45 published morphological data sets. First-order jackknifing is used to determine the effects that each terminal has on inferred relationships, on the number of MPTs, and on CI' and RI as measures of homoplasy. Bootstrap leaf stabilities provide a proxy for the contribution of individual taxa to the branch support in the rest of the tree. There is no significant difference in the impact of fossil versus extant taxa on relationships, numbers of MPTs, and CI' or RI. However, adding individual fossil taxa is more likely to reduce the total branch support of the tree than adding extant taxa. This must be weighed against the superior taxon sampling afforded by including judiciously coded fossils, providing data from otherwise unsampled regions of the tree. We therefore recommend that investigators should include fossils, in the absence of compelling and case specific reasons for their exclusion.

Keywords: Fossils; leaf stability; relationships; resolution; MPTs

Received January 23, 2007; Revised March 19, 2007; Accepted June 4, 2007
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
J. J. Wiens
Paleontology, Genomics, and Combined-Data Phylogenetics: Can Molecular Data Improve Phylogeny Estimation for Fossil Taxa?
Syst Biol, May 19, 2009; (2009) syp012v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
M. A. Wills, P. M. Barrett, and J. F. Heathcote
The Modified Gap Excess Ratio (GER*) and the Stratigraphic Congruence of Dinosaur Phylogenies
Syst Biol, December 1, 2008; 57(6): 891 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
R. A Jenner and D.T. J Littlewood
Problematica old and new
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1503 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.