Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(4):662-676; doi:10.1080/10635150600920693
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Increasing Data Transparency and Estimating Phylogenetic Uncertainty in Supertrees: Approaches Using Nonparametric Bootstrapping

Brian R. Moore, Stephen A. Smith and Michael J. Donoghue

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA E-mail: brian.moore{at}yale.edu (B.R.M.)

Edited by Olaf Bininda-Emonds: Associate Editor


   Abstract

The estimation of ever larger phylogenies requires consideration of alternative inference strategies, including divide-and-conquer approaches that decompose the global inference problem to a set of smaller, more manageable component problems. A prominent locus of research in this area is the development of supertree methods, which estimate a composite tree by combining a set of partially overlapping component topologies. Although promising, the use of component tree topologies as the primary data dissociates supertrees from complexities within the underling character data and complicates the evaluation of phylogenetic uncertainty. We address these issues by exploring three approaches that variously incorporate nonparametric bootstrapping into a common supertree estimation algorithm (matrix representation with parsimony, although any algorithm might be used), including bootstrap-weighting, source-tree bootstrapping, and hierarchical bootstrapping. We illustrate these procedures by means of hypothetical and empirical examples. Our preliminary experiments suggest that these methods have the potential to improve the correspondence of supertree estimates to those derived from simultaneous analysis of the combined data and to allow uncertainty in supertree topologies to be quantified. The ability to increase the transparency of supertrees to the underlying character data has several practical implications and sheds new light on an old debate. These methods have been implemented in the freely available program, tREeBOOT.

Keywords: Bootstrap-weighted MRP; hierarchical bootstrapping; nodal support; phylogenetic uncertainty; source-tree bootstrapping; supertree; taxonomic congruence; total evidence

Received August 18, 2005; Revised October 7, 2005; Accepted July 19, 2006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
W. J. Baker, V. Savolainen, C. B. Asmussen-Lange, M. W. Chase, J. Dransfield, F. Forest, M. M. Harley, N. W. Uhl, and M. Wilkinson
Complete Generic-Level Phylogenetic Analyses of Palms (Arecaceae) with Comparisons of Supertree and Supermatrix Approaches
Syst Biol, May 30, 2009; (2009) syp021v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Ruta, D. Pisani, G. T Lloyd, and M. J Benton
A supertree of Temnospondyli: cladogenetic patterns in the most species-rich group of early tetrapods
Proc R Soc B, December 22, 2007; 274(1629): 3087 - 3095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.