Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2006 55(4):637-643; doi:10.1080/10635150600865567
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pagel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Venditti, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pagel, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 Society of Systematic Biologists

Detecting the Node-Density Artifact in Phylogeny Reconstruction

Chris Venditti, Andrew Meade and Mark Pagel

School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, England E-mail: m.pagel{at}reading.ac.uk (M.P.)

Edited by Thomas Buckley: Associate Editor


  Abstract

The node-density effect is an artifact of phylogeny reconstruction that can cause branch lengths to be underestimated in areas of the tree with fewer taxa. Webster, Payne, and Pagel (2003, Science 301:478) introduced a statistical procedure (the "delta" test) to detect this artifact, and here we report the results of computer simulations that examine the test's performance. In a sample of 50,000 random data sets, we find that the delta test detects the artifact in 94.4% of cases in which it is present. When the artifact is not present (n = 10,000 simulated data sets) the test showed a type I error rate of approximately 1.69%, incorrectly reporting the artifact in 169 data sets. Three measures of tree shape or "balance" failed to predict the size of the node-density effect. This may reflect the relative homogeneity of our randomly generated topologies, but emphasizes that nearly any topology can suffer from the artifact, the effect not being confined only to highly unevenly sampled or otherwise imbalanced trees. The ability to screen phylogenies for the node-density artifact is important for phylogenetic inference and for researchers using phylogenetic trees to infer evolutionary processes, including their use in molecular clock dating.

Keywords: Delta test; molecular clock; molecular evolution; node-density effect; phylogenetic reconstruction; speciation; simulation

Received September 2, 2005; Revised November 11, 2005; Accepted January 11, 2006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
D. C. Marshall
Cryptic Failure of Partitioned Bayesian Phylogenetic Analyses: Lost in the Land of Long Trees
Syst Biol, November 17, 2009; (2009) syp080v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
C. Venditti, A. Meade, and M. Pagel
Phylogenetic Mixture Models Can Reduce Node-Density Artifacts
Syst Biol, April 1, 2008; 57(2): 286 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
S. Ekman, H. L. Andersen, and M. Wedin
The Limitations of Ancestral State Reconstruction and the Evolution of the Ascus in the Lecanorales (Lichenized Ascomycota)
Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 141 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.