Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(3):432-440; doi:10.1080/10635150590946745
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeBry, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DeBry, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

The Systematic Component of Phylogenetic Error as a Function of Taxonomic Sampling Under Parsimony

Ronald W. DeBry

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati Box 210006, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45221–0006, USA E-mail: ron.debry{at}uc.edu

Edited by Tim Collins: Associate Editor


  Abstract

The effect of taxonomic sampling on phylogenetic accuracy under parsimony is examined by simulating nucleotide sequence evolution. Random error is minimized by using very large numbers of simulated characters. This allows estimation of the consistency behavior of parsimony, even for trees with up to 100 taxa. Data were simulated on 8 distinct 100-taxon model trees and analyzed as stratified subsets containing either 25 or 50 taxa, in addition to the full 100-taxon data set. Overall accuracy decreased in a majority of cases when taxa were added. However, the magnitude of change in the cases in which accuracy increased was larger than the magnitude of change in the cases in which accuracy decreased, so, on average, overall accuracy increased as more taxa were included. A stratified sampling scheme was used to assess accuracy for an initial subsample of 25 taxa. The 25-taxon analyses were compared to 50- and 100-taxon analyses that were pruned to include only the original 25 taxa. On average, accuracy for the 25 taxa was improved by taxon addition, but there was considerable variation in the degree of improvement among the model trees and across different rates of substitution.

Keywords: Parsimony; phylogenetic accuracy; phylogenetic error; taxon sampling

Received April 22, 2004; Revised August 5, 2004; Accepted October 7, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Syst BiolHome page
T. A. Heath, D. J. Zwickl, J. Kim, and D. M. Hillis
Taxon Sampling Affects Inferences of Macroevolutionary Processes from Phylogenetic Trees
Syst Biol, February 1, 2008; 57(1): 160 - 166.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.