Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2005 54(2):183-196; doi:10.1080/10635150590923254
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salamin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Savolainen, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Salamin, N.
Right arrow Articles by Savolainen, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2005 Society of Systematic Biologists

Towards Building the Tree of Life: A Simulation Study for All Angiosperm Genera

Nicolas Salamin1,2, Trevor R. Hodkinson1 and Vincent Savolainen2

1 Department of Botany, University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin 2, Ireland E-mail: nicolas.salamin{at}unil.ch
2 Molecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond Surrey, TW9 3DS, London, UK

Edited by Mark Holder: Associate Editor Chris Simon Editor


   Abstract

Comprehensive phylogenetic trees are essential tools to better understand evolutionary processes. For many groups of organisms or projects aiming to build the Tree of Life, comprehensive phylogenetic analysis implies sampling hundreds to thousands of taxa. For the tree of all life this task rises to a highly conservative 13 million. Here, we assessed the performances of methods to reconstruct large trees using Monte Carlo simulations with parameters inferred from four large angiosperm DNA matrices, containing between 141 and 567 taxa. For each data set, parameters of the HKY85+{Gamma} model were estimated and used to simulate 20 new matrices for sequence lengths from 100 to 10,000 base pairs. Maximum parsimony and neighbor joining were used to analyze each simulated matrix. In our simulations, accuracy was measured by counting the number of nodes in the model tree that were correctly inferred. The accuracy of the two methods increased very quickly with the addition of characters before reaching a plateau around 1000 nucleotides for any sizes of trees simulated. An increase in the number of taxa from 141 to 567 did not significantly decrease the accuracy of the methods used, despite the increase in the complexity of tree space. Moreover, the distribution of branch lengths rather than the rate of evolution was found to be the most important factor for accurately inferring these large trees. Finally, a tree containing 13,000 taxa was created to represent a hypothetical tree of all angiosperm genera and the efficiency of phylogenetic reconstructions was tested with simulated matrices containing an increasing number of nucleotides up to a maximum of 30,000. Even with such a large tree, our simulations suggested that simple heuristic searches were able to infer up to 80% of the nodes correctly.

Keywords: Angiosperms; maximum parsimony; Monte Carlo simulations; neighbor joining; taxon sampling; Tree of Life

Received October 21, 2003; Revised February 8, 2004; Accepted November 1, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
M. M. McMahon and M. J. Sanderson
Phylogenetic Supermatrix Analysis of GenBank Sequences from 2228 Papilionoid Legumes
Syst Biol, October 1, 2006; 55(5): 818 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.