Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2004 53(6):889-903; doi:10.1080/10635150490522610
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hibbett, D. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists

Trends in Morphological Evolution in Homobasidiomycetes Inferred Using Maximum Likelihood: A Comparison of Binary and Multistate Approaches

David S. Hibbett

Biology Department, Clark University Worcester Massachusetts 01610, USA; E-mail: dhibbett{at}black.clarku.edu

Edited by François Lutzoni: Associate Editor


   Abstract

The homobasidiomycetes is a diverse group of macrofungi that includes mushrooms, puffballs, coral fungi, and other forms. This study used maximum likelihood methods to determine if there are general trends (evolutionary tendencies) in the evolution of fruiting body forms in homobasidiomycetes, and to estimate the ancestral forms of the homobasidiomycetes and euagarics clade. Character evolution was modeled using a published 481-species phylogeny under two character-coding regimes: additive binary coding, using DISCRETE, and multistate (five-state) coding, using MULTISTATE. Inferences regarding trends in character evolution made under binary coding were often in conflict with those made under multistate coding, suggesting that the additive binary coding approach cannot serve as a surrogate for multistate methods. MULTISTATE was used to develop a "minimal" model of fruiting body evolution, in which the 20 parameters that specify rates of transformations among character states were grouped into the fewest possible rate categories. The minimal model required only four rate categories, one of which is approaching zero, and suggests the following conclusions regarding trends in evolution of homobasidiomycete fruiting bodies: (1) there is an active trend favoring the evolution of pileate-stipitate forms (those with a cap and stalk); (2) the hypothesis that the evolution of gasteroid forms (those with internal spore production, such as puffballs) is irreversible cannot be rejected; and (3) crustlike resupinate forms are not a particularly labile morphology. The latter finding contradicts the conclusions of a previous study that used binary character coding. Ancestral state reconstructions under binary coding suggest that the ancestor of the homobasidiomycetes was resupinate and the ancestor of the euagarics clade was pileate-stipitate, but ancestral state reconstructions under multistate coding did not resolve the ancestral form of either node. The results of this study illustrate the potential sensitivity of comparative analyses to character state definitions.

Keywords: Character coding; comparative methods; DISCRETE; fungi; morphology; MULTISTATE; phylogeny

Received June 11, 2003; Revised October 27, 2003; Accepted August 2, 2004
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. A. Hodges and N. J. Derieg
Colloquium Papers: Adaptive radiations: From field to genomic studies
PNAS, June 16, 2009; 106(Supplement_1): 9947 - 9954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
D. L. Lindner and M. T. Banik
Molecular phylogeny of Laetiporus and other brown rot polypore genera in North America
Mycologia, May 1, 2008; 100(3): 417 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
R.-L. Zhao, R. Jeewon, D. E. Desjardin, K. Soytong, and K. D. Hyde
Ribosomal DNA phylogenies of Cyathus: Is the current infrageneric classification appropriate?
Mycologia, May 1, 2007; 99(3): 385 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Syst BiolHome page
R. A. B. Leschen and T. R. Buckley
Multistate Characters and Diet Shifts: Evolution of Erotylidae (Coleoptera)
Syst Biol, February 1, 2007; 56(1): 97 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
K. Hosaka, S. T. Bates, R. E. Beever, M. A. Castellano, W. Colgan III, L. S. Dominguez, E. R. Nouhra, J. Geml, A. J. Giachini, S. R. Kenney, et al.
Molecular phylogenetics of the gomphoid-phalloid fungi with an establishment of the new subclass Phallomycetidae and two new orders
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 949 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
S. L. Miller, E. Larsson, K.-H. Larsson, A. Verbeken, and J. Nuytinck
Perspectives in the new Russulales
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 960 - 970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
M. Binder and D. S. Hibbett
Molecular systematics and biological diversification of Boletales
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 971 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
P. B. Matheny, J. M. Curtis, V. Hofstetter, M. C. Aime, J.-M. Moncalvo, Z.-W. Ge, Z.-L. Yang, J. C. Slot, J. F. Ammirati, T. J. Baroni, et al.
Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview
Mycologia, November 1, 2006; 98(6): 982 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MycologiaHome page
A. Pringle, S. N. Patek, M. Fischer, J. Stolze, and N. P. Money
The captured launch of a ballistospore
Mycologia, July 1, 2005; 97(4): 866 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.