Skip Navigation

Systematic Biology 2004 53(4):582-593; doi:10.1080/10635150490468756
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Inagaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Inagaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Roger, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2004 Society of Systematic Biologists

Phylogenetic Artifacts Can be Caused by Leucine, Serine, and Arginine Codon Usage Heterogeneity: Dinoflagellate Plastid Origins as a Case Study

Yuji Inagaki1, Alastair G. B. Simpson2, Joel B. Dacks1,3 and Andrew J. Roger1

1 Department of Bioscience, Nagahama Institute of Bioscience and Technology 1266 Tamura Nagahama Shiga 526–0829 Japan; E-mail: yinagai{at}dal.ca (Y.I.)
2 Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, Department of Biology, Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia B3H 4J1 Canada

Edited by Gavin Naylor: Associate Editor


   Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses of first and second codon positions (DNA1 + 2 analysis) and amino acid sequences (protein analysis) are often thought to provide similar estimates of deep-level phylogeny. However, here we report a novel artifact influencing DNA level phylogenetic inference of protein-coding genes introduced by codon usage heterogeneity that causes significant incongruities between DNA1 + 2 and protein analyses. DNA1 + 2 analyses of plastid-encoded psbA genes (encoding of photosystem II D1 proteins) strongly suggest a relationship between haptophyte plastids and typical (peridinin-containing) dinoflagellate plastids. The psbA genes from haptophytes and a subset of the peridinin-type plastids display similar codon usage patterns for Leu, Ser, and Arg, which are each encoded by two separated codon sets that differ at first or first plus second codon positions. Our detailed analyses clearly indicate that these unusual preferences shared by haptophyte and some peridinin-type plastid genes are largely responsible for their strong affinity in DNA analyses. In particular, almost all of the support from DNA level analyses for the monophyly of haptophyte and peridinin-type plastids is lost when the codons corresponding to constant Leu, Ser, and Arg amino acids are excluded, suggesting that this signal comes from rapidly evolving synonymous substitutions, rather than from substitutions that result in amino acid changes. Indeed, protein maximum-likelihood analyses of concatenated PsaA and PsbA amino acid sequences indicate that, although 19' hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin-type (19' HNOF-type) plastids in dinoflagellates group with haptophyte plastids, peridinin-type plastids group weakly with those of stramenopiles. Consequently our results cast doubt on the single origin of peridinin-type and 19' HNOF-type plastids in dinoflagellates previously suggested on the basis of psaA and psbA concatenated gene phylogenetic analyses. We suggest that codon usage heterogeneity could be a more general problem for DNA level analyses of protein-coding genes, even when third codon positions are excluded.

Keywords: Chromalveolate hypothesis; codon usage bias; concatenated gene phylogeny; dinoflagellates; long-branch attraction; model misspecification; phylogenetic artifact; plastid evolution

Received July 2, 2003; Revised November 3, 2003; Accepted March 5, 2004


3 Current address: Department of Zoology, National History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD United Kingdom


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Shalchian-Tabrizi, M. Skanseng, F. Ronquist, D. Klaveness, T. R. Bachvaroff, C. F. Delwiche, A. Botnen, T. Tengs, and K. S. Jakobsen
Heterotachy Processes in Rhodophyte-Derived Secondhand Plastid Genes: Implications for Addressing the Origin and Evolution of Dinoflagellate Plastids
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2006; 23(8): 1504 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Bot.Home page
J. R. Bennett and S. Mathews
Phylogeny of the parasitic plant family Orobanchaceae inferred from phytochrome A
Am. J. Botany, July 1, 2006; 93(7): 1039 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. R. Bachvaroff, M. V. Sanchez Puerta, and C. F. Delwiche
Chlorophyll c-Containing Plastid Relationships Based on Analyses of a Multigene Data Set with All Four Chromalveolate Lineages
Mol. Biol. Evol., September 1, 2005; 22(9): 1772 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
H. S. Yoon, J. D. Hackett, F. M. Van Dolah, T. Nosenko, K. L. Lidie, and D. Bhattacharya
Tertiary Endosymbiosis Driven Genome Evolution in Dinoflagellate Algae
Mol. Biol. Evol., May 1, 2005; 22(5): 1299 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.